One of the great things about OSM, is that it shows the informal social
trails, cut through routes and fence gaps.
One of the bad things about OSM, is that it shows the informal social
trails, cut through routes and fence gaps.
I've been mapping these highway=path, informal=yes. I feel that *acce
I'm interested in tagging food storage lockers for backpackers and campers.
The first of these were installed in Yosemite National park, California,
for protecting food from bears.
Newer versions have appeared in areas without bears, but where frequent
camping
has brought aggressive raccoons or ot
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Tijmen Stam wrote:
> On 2016-06-11 23:11, Tijmen Stam wrote:
>>
>> On 11-06-16 04:16, James Mast wrote:
>>>
I've been using the "turn:lanes:*=none;slight_right" &
"slight_left;none" tags to indicate which side a new lane has been added
on a highway
On 2016-06-11 23:11, Tijmen Stam wrote:
On 11-06-16 04:16, James Mast wrote:
I've been using the "turn:lanes:*=none;slight_right" &
"slight_left;none" tags to indicate which side a new lane has been added
on a highway when going from 1 to 2 lanes (sometimes
"slight_left;slight_right" if the ori
I assume "transition" is meant, and not "transit"...
On 2016-06-11 23:11, Tijmen Stam wrote:
> On 11-06-16 04:16, James Mast wrote:
>
>> I've been using the "turn:lanes:*=none;slight_right" &
>> "slight_left;none" tags to indicate which side a new lane has been added
>> on a highway when go
On 11-06-16 04:16, James Mast wrote:
I've been using the "turn:lanes:*=none;slight_right" &
"slight_left;none" tags to indicate which side a new lane has been added
on a highway when going from 1 to 2 lanes (sometimes
"slight_left;slight_right" if the original lane is centered between the
two new
My confusion was specifically about the use of `none` as part of a multiple
lane indicator - like `none;left`or `none;right`.
`none` by itself is well documented and clear.
Thanks, Bryan
> On Jun 11, 2016, at 3:28 PM, Johan C wrote:
>
> In that case they also missed the examples on the same
In that case they also missed the examples on the same page :-)
Op 11 jun. 2016 20:04 schreef "Mike N" :
> On 6/11/2016 12:00 PM, Johan C wrote:
>
>> I completely agree with Marc. Using none as a value in case no turn
>> indication is present is valid, using || isn't. See the values of the
>> turn
On 6/11/2016 12:00 PM, Johan C wrote:
I completely agree with Marc. Using none as a value in case no turn
indication is present is valid, using || isn't. See the values of the
turn:lanes key on this page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn:lanes for reference.
And I just realized tha
On 6/11/2016 12:00 PM, Johan C wrote:
I completely agree with Marc. Using none as a value in case no turn
indication is present is valid, using || isn't. See the values of the
turn:lanes key on this page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn:lanes for reference.
Thanks for the confirm
I completely agree with Marc. Using none as a value in case no turn
indication is present is valid, using || isn't. See the values of the
turn:lanes key on this page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn:lanes for reference.
Cheers, Johan
2016-06-11 7:44 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis :
> I must
11 matches
Mail list logo