[Tagging] Relations in Transport for London: network and operator

Hi all, (Cross-posting to tagging and talk-gb-london.) I've been looking at type=public_transport public_transport=stop_area relations in Transport for London. *First question: operator. *Should this be "Transport for London" or the actual operator? TfL owns and retains branding control, but

Re: [Tagging] Bus routes forward/backward

On 13-07-16 22:35, Kieron Thwaites wrote: On 13 July 2016 at 12:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: +1. Some people also add a third relation (route master) to group the two (plus eventual variants). This should be considered mandatory. What is also done in the

Re: [Tagging] Bus routes forward/backward

On 13 July 2016 at 12:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > +1. Some people also add a third relation (route master) to group the two > (plus eventual variants). This should be considered mandatory. --K ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Bus routes forward/backward

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 2016-07-13 8:39 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson : > >> I would advise against this; and instead use a separate relation for each >> direction of a route as it greatly simplifies maintenance of

Re: [Tagging] Bus routes forward/backward

2016-07-13 8:39 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson : > I would advise against this; and instead use a separate relation for each > direction of a route as it greatly simplifies maintenance of the route. +1. Some people also add a third relation (route master) to group the two (plus

Re: [Tagging] Bus routes forward/backward

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Hans De Kryger wrote: > If i remove the forward/backward tag on a section of a way (part of the > bus route) does that signify the bus goes both ways? > I would advise against this; and instead use a separate relation for each