Re: [Tagging] Minibus routes

2016-09-08 15:39 GMT+02:00 Jo : > Just tag the route relation in some way, or use roles to indicate which > ways the minibus would stop anywhere. +1, or you could split the route in parts and add a "stops anywhere on demand tag" to some of them (and also regroup the

Re: [Tagging] Best tagging practices for winery "tasting rooms"

In that case, I should probably also include: beer=no liquor=no Would "tourism=wine_tasting" be inappropriate? It just seems to me that "tourism=attraction" is too generic. --jack Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 17:17:44 +0200 > From: Martin Koppenhoefer > To:

Re: [Tagging] Minibus routes

extending stop_position to way would make the whole concept of stop_position meaningless. Very soon all ways woud be tagged stop_position Just tag the route relation in some way, or use roles to indicate which ways the minibus would stop anywhere. Polyglot 2016-09-08 14:45 GMT+02:00 tomoya

Re: [Tagging] Minibus routes

2016-09-08 18:08 GMT+09:00 Felix Delattre : >Inside the city center the bus would stop on dedicated bus stops, but once they are out of the densely populated area, they stop on people's demand. In Japan, there are such kind of bus route too. So "on_demand=yes" flag on

Re: [Tagging] Minibus routes

2016-09-08 9:19 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > > - Are those built/maintained by the bus company or a related contractor ? > > it doesn't matter who builds or maintains the bus stop, the important > thing is that the bus stops there. There could be a contractor

Re: [Tagging] Minibus routes

I agree here. What would a good tag be we can use to declare this? bus_stops=on_demand? In the given example I would not add the bus stop plattform to the bus route relation! As they are not linked to the route, and there are only for convenience for people waiting for the bus, but also for

Re: [Tagging] Minibus routes

sent from a phone > Il giorno 08 set 2016, alle ore 09:35, Jo ha scritto: > > on_demand is for a different kind of bus service. > > For those you have to call to the operator and tell from which stop you want > to start and where you want to go. Then the bus travels from

Re: [Tagging] Minibus routes

on_demand is for a different kind of bus service. For those you have to call to the operator and tell from which stop you want to start and where you want to go. Then the bus travels from that stop to the other, sometimes picking up/dropping off other passengers, but without a fixed itinerary.

Re: [Tagging] Minibus routes

sent from a phone > Il giorno 08 set 2016, alle ore 08:32, Éric Gillet > ha scritto: > > Finally, I don't think there is a a already-used tag to mean that the vehicle > can stop "on-demand" in the type=route relations, but feel free to start or > propose a new

Re: [Tagging] Minibus routes

sent from a phone > Il giorno 08 set 2016, alle ore 08:32, Éric Gillet > ha scritto: > > Two more questions that could settle whether they should be included : > - Is there a timetable mentionning those platforms ? in Rome there are no timetables for regular

Re: [Tagging] Minibus routes

sent from a phone > Il giorno 08 set 2016, alle ore 03:30, Michael Tsang ha > scritto: > > Does that mean I should just map what exist on the ground, without regarding > where the passengers enter / leave the minibus? seems like, yes. You wouldn't want to put a very

Re: [Tagging] Minibus routes

2016-09-08 3:30 GMT+02:00 Michael Tsang : > On some minibus routes, there are platforms (i.e. poles placed near the > road) > along the route but they are just for the convenience of the passengers. > However, in most of the cases, these platforms have no legal effect and >

Re: [Tagging] Minibus routes

Maybe we can have an extra tag on the route relation that the bus will stop on demand of the passengers and you only add the stops which have physical presence that are along the itinerary to the route relation. Jo 2016-09-08 3:30 GMT+02:00 Michael Tsang : > On Wednesday 07