Re: [Tagging] Amphitheatre or outdoor non-sports venue

2016-09-13 Thread Hans De Kryger
We have a small one here in Glendale, Arizona http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/308481773#map=19/33.53911/-112.18441 *Regards,* *Hans* On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:04 PM, johnw wrote: > I’m trying to tag an outdoor venue I would call an >

Re: [Tagging] Amphitheatre or outdoor non-sports venue

2016-09-13 Thread Shawn K. Quinn
On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 14:04 +0900, johnw wrote: > I’m trying to tag an outdoor venue I would call > an https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphitheatre. It is a “natural” one, > with a stage near a lake, with terraces seating for picnics or > standing for a crowded performance. [...] > Large camps,

[Tagging] Amphitheatre or outdoor non-sports venue

2016-09-13 Thread johnw
I’m trying to tag an outdoor venue I would call an https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphitheatre . It is a “natural” one, with a stage near a lake, with terraces seating for picnics or standing for a crowded performance. Here is the one I am mapping.

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Through service

2016-09-13 Thread Michael Tsang
RFC: Through service This proposes a kind of relation to associate different public transport services to become a through service, i.e. the vehicles run through the services sequentially, allowing passengers staying on board.

Re: [Tagging] Edit war at natural=cave_entrance ?

2016-09-13 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 13 September 2016 at 11:18, Richard wrote: > "Cadastre" is not an english word Really? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadastre https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cadastre -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

[Tagging] Edit war at natural=cave_entrance ?

2016-09-13 Thread Richard
Hi, .. hope we can sort it out without too much confusion: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:natural%3Dcave_entrance=138053=1343902=1342114 * "reverting changes to the meaning of cave:ref": there was no change in meaning of cave:ref by previous edits. "Cadastre" is not

Re: [Tagging] Public transport routes with multiple reference numbers

2016-09-13 Thread Jo
Maybe we need a way to tag a relation to indicate it's related to another relation. Or a superrelation containing both route segments. Jo 2016-09-13 10:42 GMT+02:00 Michael Tsang : > On Tuesday 13 September 2016 09:32:19 Jo wrote: > > As far as I'm concerned these are 2

Re: [Tagging] Public transport routes with multiple reference numbers

2016-09-13 Thread Michael Tsang
On Tuesday 13 September 2016 09:32:19 Jo wrote: > As far as I'm concerned these are 2 separate route relations. It doesn't > really matter passengers can remain seated. When something changes like the > ref number it's a different route for the organisers. I would expect it's > also shown

Re: [Tagging] Public transport routes with multiple reference numbers

2016-09-13 Thread Jo
As far as I'm concerned these are 2 separate route relations. It doesn't really matter passengers can remain seated. When something changes like the ref number it's a different route for the organisers. I would expect it's also shown differently on schedules. Jo 2016-09-13 8:35 GMT+02:00 Michael

Re: [Tagging] Public transport routes with multiple reference numbers

2016-09-13 Thread Michael Tsang
On Friday 05 August 2016 02:15:35 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 3. There is a service, due to operational reasons, identified by two > > different numbers. However, the two different numbers are used in > > different segment of the service, but in fact, they belongs to the same > > service (i.e.