Re: [Tagging] Cenotaph WAS Re: Tagging memorial sites

On 21-Sep-16 10:22 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone Il giorno 21 set 2016, alle ore 12:08, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > ha scritto: If tomb=cenotaph then money in your bank account = no money in your bank account? maybe this is not a bad

Re: [Tagging] Use of oneway=yes on waterways

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 7:06 AM, LeTopographeFou wrote: > Hi > > According to the waterway=stream wiki page (http://wiki.openstreetmap. > org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream): > > *If a flow exists, the direction of the way must be downstream (i.e. the > way direction

Re: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin)

It wouldn't be hard to prove if this conversation is in the public domain. In the original question, the data use looks much more direct than using it as a source for directed surveying. And it does look like even this is expressly forbidden by the user terms of the mentioned website.

Re: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin)

sent from a phone > Il giorno 21 set 2016, alle ore 12:46, joost schouppe > ha scritto: > > Which I think is correct, as Martin's answer also explains. well, although the collection of facts can be protected against copying, looking up those facts in a protected

Re: [Tagging] Cenotaph WAS Re: Tagging memorial sites

sent from a phone > Il giorno 21 set 2016, alle ore 12:08, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > > If tomb=cenotaph then money in your bank account = no money in your bank > account? maybe this is not a bad allegory ;-) a cenotaph is a tomb without the corpse, but looks like a

Re: [Tagging] Cenotaph WAS Re: Tagging memorial sites

sri, 21. ruj 2016. 02:59 Martin Koppenhoefer je napisao: > > You can (also additionally) add a memorial:type=cenotaph. > Memorial:type is a bad tag. Look at the values: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/memorial%3Atype#values There's obelisk, and then there is

Re: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin)

Dave, well, as I implied, no, I'm not sure. Janko started a thread in legal-talk where you can expect more knowledgeable answers. Simon Poole answered, basically, "it depends". Which I think is correct, as Martin's answer also explains. Andre Angels, your comment was really uncalled for.

Re: [Tagging] Cenotaph WAS Re: Tagging memorial sites

On 21-Sep-16 10:58 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2016-09-21 2:41 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kenny >: Be as pedantic as you please. I'll be happy to tag a cenotaph or three if a consensus ever emerges. just use any tag you feel

Re: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin)

On 21/09/2016 07:51, joost schouppe wrote: Using copyrighted material to spot errors in OSM is still copyright violation (well, a specialist in copyright should confirm that). Hmm... Are you sure? I (& I'm sure others as well) use UK OS maps to spot features missing from OSM & then use

Re: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin)

2016-09-21 11:30 GMT+02:00 Andre Engels : > That's great nonsense. YOU CANNOT COPYRIGHT FACTS ONLY THE > PRESENTATION OF THOSE FACTS > in Europe, databases (and a map can be considered database) are protected if it took significant work to produce them, even if they are

Re: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin)

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:51 AM, joost schouppe wrote: > Using copyrighted material to spot errors in OSM is still copyright > violation (well, a specialist in copyright should confirm that). That's great nonsense. YOU CANNOT COPYRIGHT FACTS ONLY THE PRESENTATION OF

Re: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin)

André, This isn't about you - this is about project integrity. One lawsuit for copyright infringement could be enough to kill the project. Or we could get our data users into serious problems. Whether or not you are an excellent mapper is not the question. It is just not something we can take