Re: [Tagging] Admin_level=2 for non-independent countries

2016-10-08 Thread Colin Smale
Well, I think there are two different points in here, which need to be treated separately. Firstly how to represent the relationship between dependent states and their "parents", and secondly how to link the capital to the territory it is the capital of. In both cases I think the boundary relations

Re: [Tagging] Admin_level=2 for non-independent countries

2016-10-08 Thread Joachim
So regarding my question you say the implicit admin_level of a capital should mirror the boundaries. A difference between "independent" and non-independent should be developed there if needed. 2016-10-08 14:32 GMT+02:00 Colin Smale : > Instead of labelling the city itself with capital=yes, conside

Re: [Tagging] Admin_level=2 for non-independent countries

2016-10-08 Thread Colin Smale
Instead of labelling the city itself with capital=yes, consider adding the city to the admin boundary with a role of "capital". Like that a city can easily be capital of multiple administrative units (it might be a national capital and a provincial capital at the same time) and it stays distinct fr

[Tagging] Admin_level=2 for non-independent countries

2016-10-08 Thread Joachim
While editing capital=yes I came across capitals of non-independent countries which have their national border tagged with admin_level=2 (I just did a browser site search in https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/boundaries/). Wikipedia was used to assemble the list (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_