Re: [Tagging] Exit list signs?

2017-01-20 Thread Hans De Kryger
I use highway=traffic_sign for those On Jan 19, 2017 2:05 PM, "Albert Pundt" wrote: > What's the best way to map signs like this > on freeways/motorways that list exits > serving a particular area, including destinations, distances to the

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] destination:street

2017-01-20 Thread yo paseopor
Little apreciation: Please, no multiple values,no semicolon.Better subtags yopaseopor ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] destination:street

2017-01-20 Thread Martijn van Exel
Hi Duane, Thanks. I had overlooked the examples page (even though I searched the OSM wiki for the exact term!) I do appreciate the granularity of the destination:street tagging and would encourage the Telenav mappers to use it as well then, but we like to stick to conventions that are

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] destination:street

2017-01-20 Thread Martijn van Exel
In the US the prefix would typically be in the network tag, like network=US:US ref=89 for US highway 89, etc. We have seen some of this in Canada as well. (CA:ON for Ontario highways etc.) Martijn van Exel > On Jan 20, 2017, at 12:57 AM, Paul Norman wrote: > > On 1/19/2017

Re: [Tagging] zero waste

2017-01-20 Thread Greg Troxel
joost schouppe writes: > While this all makes sense, I wonder why something like fair_trade doesn't > follows that logic too. That's a good point. I don't think there is any justification for it being different. But, "fair trade" is obviously a political point of

Re: [Tagging] shop=fuel

2017-01-20 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-01-20 11:28 GMT+01:00 Dave Swarthout : > By the way, how did we manage to get to this point when the OP was about > shop=fuel? because shop=fuel was proposed as tag for alternative places compared to actual petrol stations (amenity=fuel) for cases where someone

Re: [Tagging] shop=fuel

2017-01-20 Thread Dave Swarthout
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > ultimately it's up to the mapper, but I would surely refrain from adding a > sells:ice_icream tag to supermarkets. Agreed. I would also refrain from adding sells:ice_icream to shop=fuel. By the way, how did

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] destination:street

2017-01-20 Thread Paul Norman
On 1/19/2017 5:00 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: Looking at a random one, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34154734 / http://openstreetcam.org/details/10767/4194 — I think in the US we would just map this as destination=Carman Road;Iriquois and destination:ref=1 That is how it would be

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - dog toilets

2017-01-20 Thread joost schouppe
Hi, There were some previous discussions on how we could tag designated areas for dogs to urinate/defecate. They are quite common, but unfortunately there are many different tags going around for lack of documentation. I have added a section to an old proposal page with these options (also links

Re: [Tagging] shop=fuel

2017-01-20 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 20 Jan 2017, at 06:44, Marc Gemis wrote: > > But how do you distinguish those from the places where you can buy one > of these or fresh ice cream (and chose between 1 to tens of flavours) > or the Italian type. The places a typical tourist is