[Tagging] "Living street" in Japan

2017-03-28 Thread John Willis
As I have been coming back to tagging recently, I noticed a lot of rural residential/alley/driveway/track roads being mapped as a “living street” in my region of Japan. A prolific editor (2000+ edits) is one of the mappers doing it, so I Im unsure about what is going on. As far as I know, “

Re: [Tagging] natural=bay on areas

2017-03-28 Thread Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
No, I just tagged the edge of the bay as natural=coastline because this is the top of the tidal range. Even being more rigorous the natural=coastline must be shifted far away towards west of current position. The lower part of Georges River is a typical ria: an unglaciated valley submerged into

Re: [Tagging] Stećci - Bosnian medieval tombstones

2017-03-28 Thread Kevin Kenny
A tomb without a body, built to commemorate dead whose remains lie elsewhere, is a 'cenotaph'. There's an earlier, inconclusive, thread on the topic: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-September/030196.html On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Michal Fabík wrote: > Hi, > some t

Re: [Tagging] Tagging town/village/hamlet - am I misunderstanding something?

2017-03-28 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Greg Troxel wrote: > This is definitely messy. Legally, in Massachusetts we have cities and > towns, both admin_level=8; they are the same thing, but (slightly > oversimplifying in a way that doesn't matter for this dicussion) > governed by city council vs town me

Re: [Tagging] named spots in settlements (toponyms)

2017-03-28 Thread Greg Troxel
Martin Koppenhoefer writes: > This question is about toponyms. Usually these are tagged within the > place-tags (some might be found in "natural" etc.). Someone wants to map > named spots in the city, although there are no signs, these names are > commonly known in the town (one name derives for

Re: [Tagging] Tagging town/village/hamlet - am I misunderstanding something?

2017-03-28 Thread Greg Troxel
Martin Koppenhoefer writes: > 2017-03-27 16:38 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kenny : > >> But now I see that the places - for example, Fort Montgomery, NY >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/175462 - no longer have their names >> rendered on the map. Are municipalities a special case, where the point tag

Re: [Tagging] Stećci - Bosnian medieval tombstones

2017-03-28 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 28 Mar 2017, at 23:28, Michal Fabík wrote: > > historic=tombstone + tombstone=stećak > > + probably the most accurate > - not well established (just one occurrence of historic=tombstone according > to taginfo.osm.org) > - not sure whether all of them are tombstones I

[Tagging] Stećci - Bosnian medieval tombstones

2017-03-28 Thread Michal Fabík
Hi, some time ago, I was wondering what would be the proper way to tag a stećak (plural form stećci), a large monolithic tombstone, often with carved inscriptions and/or ornaments, found in Bosnia and neighbouring countries (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ste%C4%87ak). They are usually the sha

[Tagging] Pennsylvania colored Interstate detour routes

2017-03-28 Thread Albert Pundt
Is there an established way of mapping detour routes such as Pennsylvania's colored Interstate detours, as seen in this picture ? I would think it would be as simple as using route relations with route=detour, ref=Green/Blue/Orang

Re: [Tagging] natural=bay on areas

2017-03-28 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Tuesday 28 March 2017, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > > > A waterbody where plant and animal life matches or is close to that > > of the sea rather to that of a river or lake. > > I think it's a grey area, it's not completely like a river, nor that > of the sea. But in this case, I'm not sure, what in

Re: [Tagging] natural=bay on areas

2017-03-28 Thread Andrew Harvey
Initially I was concerned that by changing the tagging from natural=water, water=bay to natural=bay that the whole bay would be rendered as land since that's what the wiki suggests. I now see that the same user changed the edges of the bay to be natural=coastline to prevent this. I'm agree now tha

Re: [Tagging] named spots in settlements (toponyms)

2017-03-28 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-03-28 11:20 GMT+02:00 Rory McCann : > The "unpopulated place" bit is (IMO) just to separate it from > town/village/hamlet etc, where you should be able to say "How many > people live here?". In your examples, the people probably say they live > in the city, rather than the place. > yes, thi

Re: [Tagging] named spots in settlements (toponyms)

2017-03-28 Thread Rory McCann
I would suggest place=locality in this case, and have seen it used for things like that (e.g. in Dublin, Ireland https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11675220 ). The "unpopulated place" bit is (IMO) just to separate it from town/village/hamlet etc, where you should be able to say "How many people l

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign relevant direction: relation type:enforcement vs. direction=* vs. traffic_signals:direction=*

2017-03-28 Thread Marc Gemis
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:05 AM, <0174 wrote: > Hi Marc, > > I sometimes have to change the direction of a way when merging two of them > and when they are oriented in the opposite directions. I.e. when two parts > of the same road are mapped and I map the part in between, I merge all of > them wh

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign relevant direction: relation type:enforcement vs. direction=* vs. traffic_signals:direction=*

2017-03-28 Thread <0174
Hi Marc, I sometimes have to change the direction of a way when merging two of them and when they are oriented in the opposite directions. I.e. when two parts of the same road are mapped and I map the part in between, I merge all of them when there's no reason not to. I don't know if it's the