Re: [Tagging] OSM+Wikidata intro video

2017-06-15 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 15 June 2017 at 21:02, Yuri Astrakhan wrote: > This service is still looking for a proper home. If you have an extra 700GB > of space on a server, please PM. Perhaps the WMF toolserver? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - sidepath 2.0

2017-06-15 Thread Dave F
Well, as routing is primarily defined by destination, if you have two cycle routes heading in the same direction to choose from, I'm very jealous, In the real world how often do you believe that occurs? What distance from a road would you consider a path have to be before it transforms from

Re: [Tagging] dispersed settlements / scattered settlements

2017-06-15 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 15. Jun 2017, at 06:29, Vao Matua wrote: > > A landuse= tag of Dispersed_Residential or Residential_Agriculture would be > helpful and more useful than place=locality or place=isolated_dwelling you can tag actual landuse (residential or

Re: [Tagging] OSM+Wikidata intro video

2017-06-15 Thread Simon Poole
Am 15.06.2017 um 22:02 schrieb Yuri Astrakhan: > Sorry for the delay - I have updated the license on the license page > to point to ODbL and OSM -- http://88.99.164.208/wikidata/copyright.html > > This service is still looking for a proper home. If you have an extra > 700GB of space on a server,

Re: [Tagging] dispersed settlements / scattered settlements

2017-06-15 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 15. Jun 2017, at 00:11, John Willis wrote: > > What is your definition of it? a settlement consisting of dispersed houses, i.e. lots of space between them (more then just the garden), e.g. fields. Absence of a core/nucleus/centre. Wikipedia has an

Re: [Tagging] fire hydrants

2017-06-15 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 15. Jun 2017, at 14:38, Robert Koch wrote: > > Open: How do we reflect the unit? Millimetres won't work for the US. > Possibilities: >fire_hydrant:couplings=2.5";2.5";4.5" > OR: >fire_hydrant:couplings=2.5;2.5;4.5 >

Re: [Tagging] OSM+Wikidata intro video

2017-06-15 Thread Yuri Astrakhan
Sorry for the delay - I have updated the license on the license page to point to ODbL and OSM -- http://88.99.164.208/wikidata/copyright.html This service is still looking for a proper home. If you have an extra 700GB of space on a server, please PM. On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Yuri

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - sidepath 2.0

2017-06-15 Thread Malte Heynen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/sidepath_2.0 Dear all, I hope this link is enough - I do not know if I have to include anything else into the email. Thank you in advance for reading and discussing. Malte from Berlin

Re: [Tagging] metal-bladed windmills for water pumps

2017-06-15 Thread Mark Bradley
> > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 21:21:12 +0900 > From: John Willis > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] metal bladed windmills for water pumps > Message-ID:

Re: [Tagging] beer_garden

2017-06-15 Thread Dave F
On 14/06/2017 16:25, Volker Schmidt wrote: Certainly I would not put beer garden in "leisure" it's clearly a food place, hence amenity. The pub covers food & drink hence 'amenity=pub'. If that's mapped as a polygon, *=beer_garden is a sub-set with the whole boundary. DaveF

Re: [Tagging] fire hydrants

2017-06-15 Thread Richard Welty
On 6/15/17 10:02 AM, Viking wrote: > About the wrench, Richard, we could create the subtag fire_hydrant:wrench. > In Italy we have standard pentagonal or square wrench. What would you insert > in this tag? Type and size of the wrench? Something like: > fire_hydrant:wrench=square30 > Or, like

Re: [Tagging] Time is now: tag ALL traffic signs in OSM

2017-06-15 Thread marc marc
Hello, I think that tagging all traffic sign is very usefull. I hope having one day an app that automates photo-sign-osm process. Mainly because it is the easy way to detect signaling changes. The proposal is interesting but the key side should be improved. It would be useful to be compatible

Re: [Tagging] fire hydrants

2017-06-15 Thread Robert Koch
According to this wiki entry: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features/Units it would be: fire_hydrant:couplings=2.5";2.5";4.5" If not given, a default unit could be specified by the wiki entry (based on official SI units; therefore metric). Alternatively we could tell people to always

Re: [Tagging] fire hydrants

2017-06-15 Thread marc marc
Hello, fire_hydrant:outlets and fire_hydrant:couplings are not so intuitive. Without reading the wiki or the mailing, people can fill in with "yes" or with outlets number (it is the meaning of fire_hydrant:count ?) As a not-fireman, I unable to give the exact diameter of outlets. But I can and I

Re: [Tagging] fire hydrants

2017-06-15 Thread Viking
Ok Robert, I think that if in Austria firemen use letters for diameters, we should allow letters in OSM too. By the way, do you think that in an hydrant all couplings follow the same standard (UNI, or Storz, or...)? I mean in fire_hydrant:coupling_type is a single value enough to describe all

Re: [Tagging] fire hydrants

2017-06-15 Thread Richard Welty
On 6/15/17 8:38 AM, Robert Koch wrote: > Hello Richard, > > On 2017-06-15 01:32, Richard Welty wrote: >> an american usage note: >> >> the "standard" hydrant in the US has 2 x 2.5" hose connections >> and 1 x 4.5" pumper connection. other sizes have existed in the >> past. > Which coupling-type do

Re: [Tagging] fire hydrants

2017-06-15 Thread Robert Koch
Hello Richard, On 2017-06-15 01:32, Richard Welty wrote: > an american usage note: > > the "standard" hydrant in the US has 2 x 2.5" hose connections > and 1 x 4.5" pumper connection. other sizes have existed in the > past. Which coupling-type do you use? NST

Re: [Tagging] dispersed settlements / scattered settlements

2017-06-15 Thread mbranco2
Martin began this thread after a discussion in the Italian List [1] . Problem arise because we've official toponyms (they are used in addresses, in scarcely inhabited areas, where roads have not an official name). These toponyms are not strictly related to the (few) dispersed houses, but also to

Re: [Tagging] dispersed settlements / scattered settlements

2017-06-15 Thread Warin
If the land is not used for agriculture but for residences then landuse=residential. Most of the land is used for agriculture? Then landuse=farmland. Where the land between the buildings is used for both .. I'd map it landuse=farmland. And then where a residence occurs - map the building,