Re: [Tagging] Fire hydrants vs suction_point

2017-08-19 Thread Warin
On 20-Aug-17 10:02 AM, Viking wrote: colour:bonnet colour:cap colour:reflective seems for me to be in the reverse order the colour of a building is building:colour not colour:building the same exist with roof:colour light:colour ... +1 Fixed. Umm reflective is not a colour. Arr you now

Re: [Tagging] Creation of the tagging-fr list

2017-08-19 Thread Warin
On 20-Aug-17 07:15 AM, Severin Menard wrote: Hi, This email to inform you about the creation of the tagging-fr OSM mailing list for the discussions about tagging between French speaking people, facilitating the exchanges on that topic for all those that are more French than English speaker

Re: [Tagging] Fire hydrants vs suction_point

2017-08-19 Thread Viking
> colour:bonnet colour:cap colour:reflective seems for me to be in the reverse > order the colour of a building is building:colour not colour:building the > same exist with roof:colour light:colour ... +1 Fixed. > survey:date is the date of a survey (someone was there) not a functional >

[Tagging] Creation of the tagging-fr list

2017-08-19 Thread Severin Menard
Hi, This email to inform you about the creation of the tagging-fr OSM mailing list for the discussions about tagging between French speaking people, facilitating the exchanges on that topic for all those that are more French than English speaker and allowing, at last, the contribution from the

Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

2017-08-19 Thread Christian Müller
> Sent: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 20:06:29 +0100 > From: "Javier Sánchez Portero" > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas > > Josm validation will raises a warning for duplicated ways (way1

Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

2017-08-19 Thread Javier Sánchez Portero
Would any one support a proposal for a new tag building:part:levels=* to separate the levels of the building from the part as in this case: way1 {building=residential, building:part=yes, building:levels=4, building:part:levels=3} way2 {building:part=yes, building:levels=4} way2 is inside way1

Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

2017-08-19 Thread marc marc
Le 19. 08. 17 à 00:52, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > they are describing all "overground" building levels *without the roof levels* right. > and minus the building:min_level. no. min_level is a 3D feature. the level of a building as a whole doesn't take care of min_level. A building as a whole