Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v2 Vehicle Type "coach"

2017-10-06 Thread Mikolai-Alexander Gütschow
Ok, what do you think about the following options then: * route:scope with local (urban?), regional, national (long_distance?), international * public_transport:stops with non_stop, limited and many (applies mostly to buses and trains) * public_transport:service with train_replacement,

[Tagging] [proposal] barrier = plant_box

2017-10-06 Thread hvdb
If a barrier is used as a plant_box instead of a bollard . -> https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60006 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Proposed deletion of wiki pages about motorcycle_friendly=*

2017-10-06 Thread Yves
Le 6 octobre 2017 18:34:30 GMT+02:00, marc marc a écrit : >Le 04. 10. 17 à 17:44, Yves a écrit : >> Now if it's bad, you can trust the contributors not to use it. >> Also, you can take time to explain your argument against in the >> discussion page, it's a wiki ;-)

Re: [Tagging] Proposed deletion of wiki pages about motorcycle_friendly=*

2017-10-06 Thread marc marc
Le 04. 10. 17 à 17:44, Yves a écrit : > Now if it's bad, you can trust the contributors not to use it. > Also, you can take time to explain your argument against in the > discussion page, it's a wiki ;-) if an individualist contributor makes both mass changes on the wiki to mark tags that

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v2 Vehicle Type "coach"

2017-10-06 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-10-06 13:00 GMT+02:00 Michael Reichert : > Some people (including myself) started using service=* for train routes > about two to three years ago. The service=* tag was part of the Oxomoa > Schema. Why not using this tag with different values for bus routes? by

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v2 Vehicle Type "coach"

2017-10-06 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi Martin, Am 2017-10-06 um 09:51 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > what I forgot to conclude: as the values are mostly new, and it’s not an > access restriction, I’d use a different key for this, rather than bus you > could use something like route:scope or route:type etc. Some people (including

Re: [Tagging] Not mapping personal preferences and details

2017-10-06 Thread Tom Pfeifer
On 06.10.2017 03:22, Dave Swarthout wrote: IMO, this sort of information does not belong in the OSM database. If a shop owner is expert in the field, fine; let them say so in a website specific to the business and we can add the "expertise" information in that way. OSM cannot be a database of

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v2 Vehicle Type "coach"

2017-10-06 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
what I forgot to conclude: as the values are mostly new, and it’s not an access restriction, I’d use a different key for this, rather than bus you could use something like route:scope or route:type etc. Cheers, Martin sent from a phone > On 6. Oct 2017, at 02:12, Mikolai-Alexander Gütschow