Re: [Tagging] Shop=tailor vs craft=tailor

2018-03-19 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, 23:01 Graeme Fitzpatrick, wrote: > But if you don't add it to a building, where does it go? > On a separate POI mode, what is generally preferable (and necessary with more than one POI in a building)? > ___ Tagging mailing list Ta

Re: [Tagging] red housenumbers

2018-03-19 Thread Tod Fitch
Regardless of American vs British spelling, it shouldn’t be in a separate tag. If a data consumer is dealing with a house number it should not need to know a region variation that modifies the meaning by another tag not in the addr:* namespace. > On Mar 19, 2018, at 3:17 PM, marc marc wrote:

Re: [Tagging] red housenumbers

2018-03-19 Thread marc marc
and it's colour, not color. Le 19. 03. 18 à 23:10, Tod Fitch a écrit : > So now a generic geocoder/decoder would have to know to look for color=* > tagging in addition to addr:housenumber=* to evaluate addr:housenumber=* > > Sounds like a really bad idea to me. > >> On Mar 19, 2018, at 11:26 AM

Re: [Tagging] red housenumbers

2018-03-19 Thread Tod Fitch
So now a generic geocoder/decoder would have to know to look for color=* tagging in addition to addr:housenumber=* to evaluate addr:housenumber=* Sounds like a really bad idea to me. > On Mar 19, 2018, at 11:26 AM, Erkin Alp Güney wrote: > > color=background:red; may work. > > __

Re: [Tagging] Shop=tailor vs craft=tailor

2018-03-19 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On 20 March 2018 at 05:16, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > craft should not be added to a building, it doesn't refer to buildings, > > But if you don't add it to a building, where does it go? & what do you call the building that's the office / base of a plumber / electrician / similar tradesman;

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - General Contractor

2018-03-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2018-03-19 20:21 GMT+01:00 Christopher Baze : > Many have stated that my previous “contractor” proposal is not specific > enough. Therefore, I have a new proposed feature for “General Contractor” > with the same description. https://wiki.openstreetmap. > org/wiki/Proposed_features/general_contract

Re: [Tagging] Shop=tailor vs craft=tailor

2018-03-19 Thread James
i see craft=* as * skill set or prefession services are offered here. On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 3:17 PM Martin Koppenhoefer, wrote: > > > 2018-03-18 11:22 GMT+01:00 Colin Smale : > >> So if we tag a building "craft=tailoring" then that says "tailoring >> occurs in this building" or possibly "tailori

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - General Contractor

2018-03-19 Thread Christopher Baze
Many have stated that my previous "contractor" proposal is not specific enough. Therefore, I have a new proposed feature for "General Contractor" with the same description. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/general_contractor ___

Re: [Tagging] Shop=tailor vs craft=tailor

2018-03-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2018-03-18 11:22 GMT+01:00 Colin Smale : > So if we tag a building "craft=tailoring" then that says "tailoring occurs > in this building" or possibly "tailoring can be contracted in this > building" if the actual cutting and sewing happens elsewhere. > > craft should not be added to a building,

Re: [Tagging] red housenumbers

2018-03-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2018-03-19 18:35 GMT+01:00 Tom Pfeifer : > You would need to find first _why_ they have different numbers. FWIW, the black numbers are for residential uses, the red numbers for commercial use and garages. Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tag

Re: [Tagging] red housenumbers

2018-03-19 Thread Johnparis
In the case of Florence, as I understand it, the red numbers originally denoted businesses, while the black/blue numbers were for residences. It appears that they use the numeral followed by a space then a capital R, thus 49 R for number 49 rosso. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Florence_hous

Re: [Tagging] red housenumbers

2018-03-19 Thread Erkin Alp Güney
color=background:red; may work. 19-03-2018 21:24 tarihinde Martin Koppenhoefer yazdı: > > > 2018-03-19 18:35 GMT+01:00 Tom Pfeifer >: > > You would need to find first _why_ they have different numbers. > > > > I don't know why they have different numbers, but I

Re: [Tagging] red housenumbers

2018-03-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2018-03-19 18:35 GMT+01:00 Tom Pfeifer : > You would need to find first _why_ they have different numbers. > > I don't know why they have different numbers, but I can tell you that they do have different numbers, and that both are housenumbers (that's what I have been told on talk-it). Here's an

Re: [Tagging] red housenumbers

2018-03-19 Thread Tom Pfeifer
You would need to find first _why_ they have different numbers. In AT, CS, SK, there are "conscription" numbers in addition to housenumbers, which are described here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:conscriptionnumber (heavily used) https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konskriptionsnummer

Re: [Tagging] red housenumbers

2018-03-19 Thread Matthijs Melissen
On 19 March 2018 at 18:02, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > In the Italian city of Genoa there are housenumbers in black and in red, > which are different numbers. People have started mapping them with the > postfix "rosso" (red in italian) but are now wondering if there are other > areas with similar

[Tagging] red housenumbers

2018-03-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
In the Italian city of Genoa there are housenumbers in black and in red, which are different numbers. People have started mapping them with the postfix "rosso" (red in italian) but are now wondering if there are other areas with similar objects and how these are tagged. Cheers, Martin Example ho

[Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Aviation obstacle light

2018-03-19 Thread NKA mapper
Thank you for comments during the RFC phase. I believe all comments have been accommodated in the revised proposal. Please vote here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Aviation_Obstacle_Light 2018-03-06 18:00 GMT+01:00 NKA mapper : > This is a request for comments on a new