Re: [Tagging] Transport mode on platforms? (Was: Re: Documentation issues of PT tagging schemes)

Very soon after PTv2 was 'accepted' I understood that if we would ever replace hw=bus_stop NODES with pt=platform, the mode of transport would need to be added on these nodes. Ever since it's a back and forth pulling between yes the mode of transport can be added on them and NO the platforms

[Tagging] Transport mode on platforms? (Was: Re: Documentation issues of PT tagging schemes)

Hi It seems that the only problem with PTv2 that remains is the rendering of public_transport=platform, i.e. whether public_transport=platform (and maybe public_transport=station too) should get the transport mode tag(s) (bus=yes/tram=yes/...). Note that the PTv2 proposal suggested to map the

Re: [Tagging] Documentation issues of PT tagging schemes

Hi, What I would like to see is how to map a Public Transport Route in version 3 .. that has the bear minimum of things to have and the rules that make the route valid. This is where the problem sits; the point of view of what a route is vary wildly. Few people are even willing to pinpoint

Re: [Tagging] Documentation issues of PT tagging schemes

On 25/07/2018 05:58, Roland Olbricht wrote: Hi, This would not be the bells and whistles method, but the bread and water method. The basics that would have the routing working and the map displaying things. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop I see fundamental

Re: [Tagging] Flood mark or high water mark

Right Phil, thanks for this remark. Tides are rather short-term and more predictable water table variations. As such, seldom marked with physical signs. In Poland we found 0 within 262. High water mark (boundary) is probably more legal term - demarcation of water/land mainly in coastal

Re: [Tagging] Castles and manors

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:20 AM, Ture Pålsson wrote: I noticed that this structure: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190298018 is > tagged historic=castle. It is certainly not defensive (Swedish Wikipedia: > https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lennartsnäs), so I thought it needed a > castle_type, but

Re: [Tagging] Flood mark or high water mark

High water is commonly used in terms of tides. Phil (trigpoint) On 25 July 2018 13:05:56 BST, Robert Szczepanek wrote: >Hi all, > >We work on flood marks project [13] and your opinion on proper tagging >is crucial for us, as database of existing features is based on OSM >records. We have

[Tagging] Flood mark or high water mark

Hi all, We work on flood marks project [13] and your opinion on proper tagging is crucial for us, as database of existing features is based on OSM records. We have identified probably most of existing marks in Poland, but would like to finally unify tagging within OSM project. Both terms

Re: [Tagging] Castles and manors

sent from a phone > On 25. Jul 2018, at 09:20, Ture Pålsson wrote: > > It says that historic=manor can be used for "manors which are not castles", > which makes me wonder: what is the difference between a > historic=castle,castle_type=manor and a historic=manor? I’m not sure there is any

[Tagging] Castles and manors

I noticed that this structure: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190298018 is tagged historic=castle. It is certainly not defensive (Swedish Wikipedia: https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lennartsnäs), so I thought it needed a castle_type, but reading

Re: [Tagging] landuse=sand

sent from a phone > On 25. Jul 2018, at 03:14, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Done. There will probably be more in the future. thank you! ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging