[Tagging] Using multipolygons to map bays in Alaska

Since the long thread I started about multipolygons [1 ] is sort of winding down, I thought it best to start a new one to discuss something I've been doing since learning from that thread of the amazing power of the

Re: [Tagging] Proposed features - RFC - Pipe valves

On 15/11/18 10:39, François Lacombe wrote: Hi all, The proposal about valves I was working on has reached the RFC status tonight https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Pipeline_valves_proposal Goal is to describe with better destails how pipeline=valve objects are built and

[Tagging] Proposed features - RFC - Pipe valves

Hi all, The proposal about valves I was working on has reached the RFC status tonight https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Pipeline_valves_proposal Goal is to describe with better destails how pipeline=valve objects are built and work. We can add visible information about

Re: [Tagging] Add some tag to identify disputed borders

sent from a phone > On 14. Nov 2018, at 10:28, SelfishSeahorse wrote: > > I like your idea with 'de_jure', 'de_facto' and 'claimed' roles. I can understand de facto and claimed, but I find de jure hard. Which law do you apply? There is international law, customary international law ok, but

Re: [Tagging] Add some tag to identify disputed borders

sent from a phone On 14. Nov 2018, at 00:02, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: >> And that's assuming a disputed flag doesn't cause more problems than it >> solves: "No, that border >> isn't disputed, we're absolutely certain it's right." says one of the >> countries involved. So now we >> need a

Re: [Tagging] Add some tag to identify disputed borders

On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 01:52, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > > My thinking on this is we should re-purpose the relation roles for this sort > of tagging. Right now we just copy the roles from type=multipolygon relations > (inner, outer) when we should be using something like the following: > >