Re: [Tagging] Yay, new howto map for diabilities created in wiki

2019-01-19 Thread Warin
On 20/01/19 09:00, Richard wrote: Hi, renamed it to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_for_the_needs_of_people_with_disabilities hope it is not too offensive for now and can be renamed later. The map is of features ... not needs... ummm 'Mapping features that cater for people wit

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)

2019-01-19 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 at 07:57, Markus wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 00:23, Graeme Fitzpatrick > wrote: > > > > OK, how about "A natural=cape can be part of a natural=peninsula, a > natural=peninsula can be part of a larger natural=peninsula, but a > natural=peninsula cannot be part of a natural

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)

2019-01-19 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 at 06:47, Markus wrote: > > The Southport Spit isn't an isthmus. Of course it isn't! I knew that so I'll blame temporary brain-fade! > By the way, natural=isthmus already exists [3]; it > just lacks a proposal. Yes, I meant that the page doesn't exist Thanks Graeme ___

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Approved - Pipeline valves

2019-01-19 Thread François Lacombe
Hi all, The vote regarding the pipeline valves topic is now closed and results show an approval rate at 80% with 20 votes. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Pipeline_valves_proposal Opinions expressed during the vote will be addressed later with further proposals or adjustment

Re: [Tagging] Drain vs ditch

2019-01-19 Thread Markus
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 13:40, Eugene Podshivalov wrote: > > ditch - Small artificial free flow waterways used for irrigating or draining > land as well as for deviding land. Irrigation ditches can be lined or > unlined, drainage ditches are usually unlined. Consider using waterway=canal > for l

Re: [Tagging] Yay, new howto map for diabilities created in wiki

2019-01-19 Thread Richard
Hi, renamed it to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_for_the_needs_of_people_with_disabilities hope it is not too offensive for now and can be renamed later. Richard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstr

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)

2019-01-19 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Saturday 19 January 2019, Markus wrote: > > And how do i as a mapper practically determine the area of Pointe > > de Pen-Hir to be about 0.3 km^2? > > By mapping the area the name Pointe de Pen-Hir refers to as area: > > https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/way/4305300517#map=15/48.26 >07/-

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)

2019-01-19 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Saturday 19 January 2019, Markus wrote: > > > > I don't know what you understand 'headland' to mean here. > > A piece of land that projects into a body of water. Sounds like a peninsula to me. In case that is still unclear: A natural=cape feature is sometimes located on a peninsula - but it d

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)

2019-01-19 Thread Markus
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 00:23, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > OK, how about "A natural=cape can be part of a natural=peninsula, a > natural=peninsula can be part of a larger natural=peninsula, but a > natural=peninsula cannot be part of a natural=cape"? Or: 'A natural=cape can be part of a natura

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)

2019-01-19 Thread Markus
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 04:03, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > A found a guide somewhere that said 300 was a good maximum number of members > for a multipolygon. Found it here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation#Size and mentioned it in the proposal. ___

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)

2019-01-19 Thread Markus
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 14:20, Christoph Hormann wrote: > > On Saturday 19 January 2019, Markus wrote: > > > > If natural=cape doesn't mean a headland forming a coastal extreme > > point, then i fail to understand what natural=cape does mean. Does it > > only mean the extreme point of a headland? A

Re: [Tagging] Trailhead tagging

2019-01-19 Thread Peter Elderson
To complicate matters, long hiking routes and cycling routes are increasingy routed using the node networks. On the web you'll find a series of node numbers, in between nodes ypu follow the node network waymarks. Any node servicing one of these trails might be considered a trailhead. In Nederland,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)

2019-01-19 Thread Markus
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 14:16, Christoph Hormann wrote: > > And how do i as a mapper practically determine the area of Pointe de > Pen-Hir to be about 0.3 km^2? By mapping the area the name Pointe de Pen-Hir refers to as area: https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/way/4305300517#map=15/48.260

Re: [Tagging] Trailhead tagging

2019-01-19 Thread Marc Gemis
It certainly makes sense. As I wrote before, there are quite few parkings in the center of small villages where they put up information maps. They might be candidates for trailheads. We'll see whether people will start mapping them as trailheads. regards m. On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:54 AM Tobia

[Tagging] defining service on railway=tram

2019-01-19 Thread Jarek Piórkowski
Hello, First time posting here, forgive if I've missed some rules. Summary: I wanted to refine tagging of some tram/streetcar tracks to show what they're used for, and found this isn't standardized and isn't documented. I would like to suggest updating wiki for Key:service to specify recommendat

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)

2019-01-19 Thread Markus
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 01:21, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > Southport Spit https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/-27.9567/153.4276 > could all also be mapped as =cape (although the Spit should possibly be an > =isthmus? {which doesn't actually exist yet!})) The Southport Spit isn't an isthmus. A

Re: [Tagging] Tag an information panel

2019-01-19 Thread Jarek Piórkowski
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 08:29, Paul Allen wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 09:58, yo paseopor wrote: >> -Information about the capacity of a parking > > Tag the capacity of the car park itself. It's more useful. People may use > the query tool (or > similar techniques) to look at the tags for th

Re: [Tagging] Tag an information panel

2019-01-19 Thread seirra
seconded, we have it here in the city centre, it's an electric LED display that shows the free spaces in real time (or just says full). in our case it is integrated into the road sign On 01/19/19 14:25, OSMDoudou wrote: > Tag the capacity of the car park itself. It's more useful. I think the

Re: [Tagging] Tag an information panel

2019-01-19 Thread OSMDoudou
> Tag the capacity of the car park itself. It's more useful. I think the OP is talking about variable display signs indicating the free capacity in real time. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/t

Re: [Tagging] Tag an information panel

2019-01-19 Thread Paul Allen
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 09:58, yo paseopor wrote: > > -Information about the capacity of a parking > Tag the capacity of the car park itself. It's more useful. People may use the query tool (or similar techniques) to look at the tags for the car park and notice the capacity. They're less likel

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)

2019-01-19 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Saturday 19 January 2019, Markus wrote: > > If natural=cape doesn't mean a headland forming a coastal extreme > point, then i fail to understand what natural=cape does mean. Does it > only mean the extreme point of a headland? Are there really names > that only refer to a point? Isn't it rather

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)

2019-01-19 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Saturday 19 January 2019, Markus wrote: > > > Frankly i don't even remotely follow your argument here. Maybe it > > would help if you could tell me how to determine the area of the > > capes i previously used as examples: > > I've never visited any of these capes and thus can't tell you if the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)

2019-01-19 Thread Markus
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 00:26, Christoph Hormann wrote: > > [...] The problem i see is - as > previously mentioned - defining natural=peninsula in a way that makes > it mean something more specific than 'some named land area at the > coast'. But that problem is completely unrelated to natural=cape

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)

2019-01-19 Thread Markus
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 00:07, Christoph Hormann wrote: > > In other words: If you want natural=cape and natural=peninsula to be > synonyms for natural=cape_or_peninsula and don't mind flushing >11k > existing natural=cape features with a well defined meaning which are > not peninsulas down the dr

[Tagging] Tag an information panel

2019-01-19 Thread yo paseopor
Hi Spanish calling Here at Spanish community of OSM we are asking about the information poles and panels we have in our cities. we are talking about 3 types: -Information about the capacity of a parking -Information about the pollution level in a city -Information about public transport ETA, and s