On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 13:28, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> The healthcare wiki page has a number of subtags listed, but not all
> are well defined. In particular, the tags for behavioral health and
> psychology services are not very well organized.
>
> There is currently a list of options for more
The healthcare wiki page has a number of subtags listed, but not all
are well defined. In particular, the tags for behavioral health and
psychology services are not very well organized.
There is currently a list of options for more specific tags to use
with healthcare=psychotherapy and
sent from a phone
> On 9. Mar 2019, at 01:31, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> & marked © www.berlinonline.net as well as OSM Contributors?
>
> Can they impose their own copyright on an OSM map?
the data is copyright osm, the map rendering is their copyright. That’s the
ODbL. You only have
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 09:47, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> it is literally a safe-keeping ground, but what it actually means is an
> area to store seized/confiscated objects (e.g. vehicles).
>
Ah, thanks, makes perfect sense now! - we know them as a holding-yard.
fun fact: there’s an official
sent from a phone
>> & what's a "Sicherstellungsgelände der Polizei" ?
fun fact: there’s an official website and their map is OSM based:
https://service.berlin.de/standort/121649/
Cheers, Martin ___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
sent from a phone
> On 9. Mar 2019, at 00:18, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> & what's a "Sicherstellungsgelände der Polizei" ? All Google can come up with
> is "freezing terrain", which I'm pretty sure isn't right!
it is literally a safe-keeping ground, but what it actually means is an
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 05:56, Jmapb wrote:
> I'd be inclined towards childcare=yes,
Yes, that seems a better option than baby_sitting
Define ages as well?
age=0-14
min_age=
max_age=
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 04:03, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> E.g. (I guess these aren't police stations,
>
Yeah, places like this one :-) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/380771
(Or is it?)
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23462697
>
& what's a "Sicherstellungsgelände der Polizei" ?
Thanks Andy
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 20:22, Andy Townsend wrote:
> There are ways that are genuinely highway=raceway:
>
Just looking at it, would I be right in saying that that stretch, & the
straight / pits over to the East are pure racetrack & nothing else, but the
rest of the circuit is public
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 17:43, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> Is route marked on the ground
>
Stays partially marked - the "boxes" for the starting grid & the start /
finish line stay year round, but are redone for the race itself. The rest
of the race lane markings get painted over after the race
On 3/7/2019 6:33 PM, Sergio Manzi wrote:
On 2019-03-07 23:31, Cascafico Giovanni wrote:
How can I tag an hotel which features baby-sitting?
I think it should be something in the lines of "service:babysitting=yes" unless
we already have something different in use...
I'd be inclined towards
Am Fr., 8. März 2019 um 20:37 Uhr schrieb Philip Barnes <
p...@trigpoint.me.uk>:
> It can be a child of any age that is too young to be left alone. The legal
> age will vary by country or state but entirely possible a 14 year old could
> be babysat. Don't take the word baby too literally,
It can be a child of any age that is too young to be left alone. The legal age
will vary by country or state but entirely possible a 14 year old could be
babysat. Don't take the word baby too literally, technically its short term
adhoc childcare whilst the parents go out for an evening.
Phil
Am Do., 7. März 2019 um 16:52 Uhr schrieb Paul Allen :
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 14:44, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
>>
>> usually areas end at their actual borders in OSM, so unless you can park
>> in the middle of the road, it should not be contained in the parking area.
>>
>
> If we usually
On 2019-03-08 17:36, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 7. Mar 2019, at 23:31, Cascafico Giovanni wrote:
>>
>> How can I tag an hotel which features baby-sitting?
>
> what does babysitting mean? Ages 0-3?
>
> Cheers, Martin
>
Am Fr., 8. März 2019 um 18:56 Uhr schrieb seirra blake <
sophietheopos...@yandex.com>:
> I'm guessing it depends on how specific the authority is.
>
good point. We should strive for least specific tagging restrictions
necessary to describe what we want.
pet=no (generally no animals allowed)
Am Do., 7. März 2019 um 01:27 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg <
joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>:
> > maintain amenity=police for public-facing police station
>
> +1 for keeping the basic tag for police stations
>
what about other police facilities that are also tagged with amenity=police
now, should
I'm guessing it depends on how specific the authority is. on the one
hand you'd think it'd usually just be either birds or no birds however I
imagine the distinction may still crop up. as I can't actually see any
article saying about animals used as access tags, I imagine it's just
tag as you
sent from a phone
> On 7. Mar 2019, at 22:58, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Presently they are tagged as per access tagging.
> motor_vehicle=yes/no
> horse=yes/no
> dog=yes/no
> ferret=yes/no
> parrot=yes/no
> etc
so birds should get individual tags based on family or species?
sent from a phone
> On 7. Mar 2019, at 23:31, Cascafico Giovanni wrote:
>
> How can I tag an hotel which features baby-sitting?
what does babysitting mean? Ages 0-3?
Cheers, Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
then I guess it might have to be pets? it isn't necessarily ideal, but
it is a lot more specific than nothing at all. from what has been said
though, it looks like pet=yes/pet=no may be more appropriate as species
are already specified in the singular form (as well as most other access
tags I
I never saw that in access before, but that actually makes a lot of
sense. conditionals are somewhat underutilised where I live so I always
forget about them, but that's a fair point
On 3/7/19 9:58 PM, Warin wrote:
On 08/03/19 00:07, seirra blake wrote:
while I can't see a problem with a
On 08/03/2019 04:31, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
Here's the one I was talking about
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9325885#map=16/-27.9868/153.4270
Only operates as a race track for 4 days a year - 1 practice, 1
qualifying & 2 race days. The rest of the year it's normal public roads.
Hi all
Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 01:40, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Let the mappers vote on if it should be in OSM by using or not using it.
> Here we should be getting the best tags, not thinking 'this is not
> something for OSM' as that is one persons view.
>
Since it's visible and
If it is import data (can you link its documentation page on the OSM wiki?)
then it certainly should not add blindly "dogs" unless it was defined this way
in source data.
10% wrong is completely unacceptable for imports.
Mar 7, 2019, 11:27 PM by cascaf...@gmail.com:
> Unfortunately dataset I'm
25 matches
Mail list logo
