Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - camp_site=camp_pitch

2019-05-21 Thread Tod Fitch
> On May 20, 2019, at 4:28 PM, marc marc wrote: > > Le 21.05.19 à 00:58, Joseph Eisenberg a écrit : >> I don’t feel enthusiastic about creating a 4th competing tagging >> standard to go along with camp_site=pitch, camp_site=camp_pitch >> and tourism=camp_pitch > > it's an argument that makes

Re: [Tagging] tag linking [was: Feature Proposal - Voting - camp_site=camp_pitch]

2019-05-21 Thread Tod Fitch
> On May 21, 2019, at 4:07 PM, marc marc wrote: > > Hello, > > Le 21.05.19 à 03:25, Tod Fitch a écrit : >> If there is someplace I can read up on this “logic of tag linking”? > > this logic is massively used and yet I had a hard time finding a link > whose content is limited to a line and an

Re: [Tagging] tag linking [was: Feature Proposal - Voting - camp_site=camp_pitch]

2019-05-21 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
While "key=X" and "X=type_of_X" is a common way of tagging properties of features, there is not a standard way of tagging features that are located within a larger feature. There are at least 4 ways of doing this: 1) "key=X" -> "X=name_of_smaller_feature", where X is the term for the larger

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - juggling spot

2019-05-21 Thread Warin
On 22/05/19 05:34, Pablo wrote: Hello, A new feature proposal which could be very useful for the juggling community. Usually, jugglers meet in specific spaces in cities (usually open spaces like parcs). There is often a day of the week which is choose to meet in priority. It s like a

[Tagging] tag linking [was: Feature Proposal - Voting - camp_site=camp_pitch]

2019-05-21 Thread marc marc
Hello, Le 21.05.19 à 03:25, Tod Fitch a écrit : > If there is someplace I can read up on this “logic of tag linking”? this logic is massively used and yet I had a hard time finding a link whose content is limited to a line and an example

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-21 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
22 May 2019, 00:38 by marc_marc_...@hotmail.com: > Le 22.05.19 à 00:16, Florian Lohoff a écrit : > >> >> Hi marc, >> >> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:02:53PM +, marc marc wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Le 21.05.19 à 23:46, Florian Lohoff a écrit : >>> Currently all Routing/Navigation

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-21 Thread marc marc
Le 22.05.19 à 00:16, Florian Lohoff a écrit : > > Hi marc, > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:02:53PM +, marc marc wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Le 21.05.19 à 23:46, Florian Lohoff a écrit : >>> Currently all Routing/Navigation application try hard to find >>> the nearest or best point on the routeable

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-21 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
22 May 2019, 00:16 by f...@zz.de: > Doesnt work - You are navigating by car but you only have a footway up > to hour house - Still the house is near road b - thus you get navigated > to the wrong street. > In this case router should be improved to route toward  house, not to road segment

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-21 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 07:47, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > - Houses which are routeable by road a but are near road b or vice > versa. > That could be a "problem" due to GPS (?) system being so accurate? For instance, where I am sitting now at the back of my house, various GPS / location /

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-21 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
21 May 2019, 23:46 by f...@zz.de: > - Houses which are routeable by road a but are near road b or vice > versa. > > Adding more roads aka service/driveway does not necessary make it more > deterministic. > Can you give example of residential building with fully mapped roads, footways and

Re: [Tagging] Aerodrome classification

2019-05-21 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Tue, 21 May 2019 at 11:05, John Willis via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > our only regional air travel option, the Gunma Heliport > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304172626 > Which rises another point - should dedicated heliports also be classified as aerodromes as far as

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-21 Thread Florian Lohoff
Hi marc, On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:02:53PM +, marc marc wrote: > Hello, > > Le 21.05.19 à 23:46, Florian Lohoff a écrit : > > Currently all Routing/Navigation application try hard to find > > the nearest or best point on the routeable network for a given > > destination lat/lon or object.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - juggling spot

2019-05-21 Thread marc marc
Hello, Le 21.05.19 à 21:34, Pablo a écrit : > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/juggling_spot I you think that juggling is a sport, sport tag exist, just add sport=juggling but we miss a main tag for sport that does not take place on a delimited sports field, the same issue

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - juggling spot

2019-05-21 Thread Jmapb
On 5/21/2019 3:34 PM, Pablo wrote A new feature proposal which could be very useful for the juggling community. Usually, jugglers meet in specific spaces in cities (usually open spaces like parcs). There is often a day of the week which is choose to meet in priority. It s like a informal

Re: [Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-21 Thread marc marc
Hello, Le 21.05.19 à 23:46, Florian Lohoff a écrit : > Currently all Routing/Navigation application try hard to find > the nearest or best point on the routeable network for a given > destination lat/lon or object. with best, you mean : only one ? that look like wrong a destination can have

[Tagging] Navaid relation?

2019-05-21 Thread Florian Lohoff
Hi, is there any Navaid relation to map an object to a point on the routeable network? Currently all Routing/Navigation application try hard to find the nearest or best point on the routeable network for a given destination lat/lon or object. I have seen this fail for multiple occurences over

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - juggling spot

2019-05-21 Thread Pablo
Hello, A new feature proposal which could be very useful for the juggling community. Usually, jugglers meet in specific spaces in cities (usually open spaces like parcs). There is often a day of the week which is choose to meet in priority. It s like a informal sport center. I thinks it s the

Re: [Tagging] Runway area mapping?

2019-05-21 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 21. May 2019, at 07:46, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > It's much easier and reliable to determine, length, bearing, centerline when > mapped as a line +1, it is easier, because it is not true that width and length aren’t contained in the area, they are just harder to get

Re: [Tagging] Aerodrome classification

2019-05-21 Thread Andy Townsend
On 20/05/2019 13:10, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: How should we classify different types of aerodromes? In a map style I maintain I use the IATA code to distinguish between "large" and "small" non-military airports: https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua#L4811

[Tagging] History of "aerodrome" changes (was: Aerodrome classification)

2019-05-21 Thread Andy Townsend
On 20/05/2019 13:10, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: History: In the very early years of OSM, there were three types of features where planes could land: aeroway=airport for airports, aeroway=airfield for undeveloped airstrips, and aeroway=aerodrome for general aviation sites, if I understand the