>
> Who did this and why? Was this an experienced contributor or a newbie?
How do you define an "experienced" and a "newbie" contributor? The amount
of map changes? The age of the account? The editor(s) he/she uses?
I have see many mappers who do it very well in their first days of mapping.
On 30/06/19 10:14, marc marc wrote:
Re: "slab=yes/no to show whether there is a slab on the pitch"
Is this different than surface=concrete? or surface=paved?
A bit different, yes.
Have a look at https://images.app.goo.gl/2qBV3P3R2wc7wmV27
surface=concrete;grass ?
Various 'checkers'
> Re: "slab=yes/no to show whether there is a slab on the pitch"
> Is this different than surface=concrete? or surface=paved?
>
> A bit different, yes.
> Have a look at https://images.app.goo.gl/2qBV3P3R2wc7wmV27
surface=concrete;grass ?
> Re: "off-ground only" for fires
I think
Le 30.06.19 à 00:57, Joseph Eisenberg a écrit :
> What is an "important object?"
> 2) "Don't map insignificant, perishable and mobile object"
> "Please do not map objects that are insignificant (like small plants),
I find this "important" very subjective, it varies according
to the contributor's
On 30/06/19 09:18, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 at 09:06, Joseph Eisenberg
mailto:joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Re: "slab=yes/no to show whether there is a slab on the pitch"
I find this confusing. Is this different than surface=concrete? or
On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 at 23:58, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
>
> What is an "important object?"
>
> Going by the examples, I can only assume that "important" means "large."
Large in extent,
large number of nodes, therefore a lot of effort to fix if somebody breaks
it.
--
Paul
On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 at 09:06, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> Re: "slab=yes/no to show whether there is a slab on the pitch"
>
> I find this confusing. Is this different than surface=concrete? or
> surface=paved?
>
A bit different, yes.
Have a look at https://images.app.goo.gl/2qBV3P3R2wc7wmV27
The
Re: "slab=yes/no to show whether there is a slab on the pitch"
I find this confusing. Is this different than surface=concrete? or
surface=paved?
Re: "off-ground only" for fires - this value has never been used for
the key openfire. I find it confusing; I think of an open fire as a
wood fire on
A couple of users added two new sections to the Good Practice page recently:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
I think these need discussion.
1) "Check the history of important objects"
"Before making significant changes to important objects (in particular
settlements,
On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 at 00:45, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> The tag tourism=camp_pitch was approved
Good work Joseph
Have added a couple of details to useful combinations for things that
campers will want to know about:
slab=yes/no to show whether there is a slab on the pitch
& "off-ground
On Saturday, 29 June 2019, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> The tag tourism=camp_pitch was approved with 24 yes votes and 1 no vote.
>
> The wiki page has been updated at
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=camp_pitch
>
> I've listed camp_site=camp_pitch as deprecated, and added
>
This is not tagging related and thus this list is not the right place
for this discussion. This has been said multiple times before and still
you did not take it elsewhere. Seems like a pattern.
On 29.06.19 18:49, Ulrich Lamm wrote:
Am 26.06.2019 um 11:22 schrieb
Am 26.06.2019 um 11:22 schrieb tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org:
> copying 1 fact from another database
That is a great understatement.
Two examples:
• An equalization of object identities between regional mappers and a regional
road authority that provides its data under the condition
The tag tourism=camp_pitch was approved with 24 yes votes and 1 no vote.
The wiki page has been updated at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=camp_pitch
I've listed camp_site=camp_pitch as deprecated, and added
tourism=camp_pitch to Map features.
It looks like the French page has
Hi,
On 6/29/19 08:05, "Christian Müller" via Tagging wrote:
> The intriguing question is:
Please (again!), move this to legal-talk or elsewhere. It has no place
on the tagging list.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
The intriguing question is:
Does use of OSM in commercial products make
OSM a commercial product? IMHO it does not.
This would blow any license like PD, BSD, etc.:
Just because companies /use/ what's available
on an open basis, doesn't change the status of
the objects used. The OSM foundation
16 matches
Mail list logo
