I've removed this statement from the page because it leads to
ambiguous data and directly contradicts the One feature per one
element rule
[Examples of bad situations:] "An area object representing a
single-use building with a point object inside it. Move the tags to
the area object and delete
I agree that this page could be improved. Until now it hasn't
mentioned the problems with tagging multiple features on one database
object.
This can be difficult for database users, for example this comment at
the Openstreetmap-carto github page:
On 05/07/19 03:11, marc marc wrote:
Le 04.07.19 à 18:26, Jmapb a écrit :
As far as I know, amenity=school is the *only* accepted landuse-esque
tagging for school grounds.
it's the perfect example of confusion between two different things.
if a school is located on the ground floor of an
This makes me think of two already used tags but I'm not sure I would
use them on planters as they describe large lands:
* landuse=allotments
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dallotments) (but
they imply some parcel assignment)
* garden:type=community
On 7/4/2019 1:11 PM, marc marc wrote:
it's the perfect example of confusion between two different things.
if a school is located on the ground floor of an apartment, office,
or commercial building, believing that amenity=school is a landuse
is wrong. in this case amenity=school (as a node or a
On 7/4/2019 12:48 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
you could also overlap (multipolygons or not) different schools when
they share the indoor space, but if there are distinct names for the
campus and the schools, we would need a tag for the campus which we
don’t have yet, AFAIK
Cheers, Martin
Le 04.07.19 à 18:26, Jmapb a écrit :
> As far as I know, amenity=school is the *only* accepted landuse-esque
> tagging for school grounds.
it's the perfect example of confusion between two different things.
if a school is located on the ground floor of an apartment, office,
or commercial
sent from a phone
> On 4. Jul 2019, at 18:26, Jmapb wrote:
>
> But what I'm faced with very often in NYC is a single campus,
> sometimes with one building and sometimes more, that's shared by several
> schools -- and there's no accurate way to divide up the buildings.
you could also overlap
On 7/4/2019 6:33 AM, Warin wrote:
On 04/07/19 20:09, Janko Mihelić wrote:
I've been tagging it with an empty amenity=school polygon around
everything, and then two points with amenity=school + name=* + all
the other specific tagging.
I too have used similar.
Usually a polygon/way with one
I personally like tagging the highway as one way with change:lanes until
the line starts to split into two. This gives data consumers more power
over what they show, and allows for a more accurate representation of
reality.
- Leif Rasmussen
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019, 3:18 PM Snusmumriken
wrote:
> On
On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 10:11 +, Philip Barnes wrote:
> On Thursday, 4 July 2019, Snusmumriken wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-07-03 at 14:03 -0600, Jack Armstrong Dancer--- via
> > talk
> > wrote:
> > > I've always had the impression we should not create separate
> > > traffic
> > > lanes unless
These also exist on street verges instead of grass and pedestrian thoroughfares.
They maybe in planters, they may not.
They may have vegetables, herbs or fruit.
To me they are a :
leisure=garden
fee=no
operator=local community
produce=vegetables;herbs;fruit
garden:function=productive (note
On 04/07/19 20:09, Janko Mihelić wrote:
I've been tagging it with an empty amenity=school polygon around
everything, and then two points with amenity=school + name=* + all the
other specific tagging.
I too have used similar.
Usually a polygon/way with one school on it and then a node inside
On Thursday, 4 July 2019, Snusmumriken wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-07-03 at 14:03 -0600, Jack Armstrong Dancer--- via talk
> wrote:
> > I've always had the impression we should not create separate traffic
> > lanes unless "traffic flows are physically separated by a barrier
> > (e.g., grass, concrete,
I've been tagging it with an empty amenity=school polygon around
everything, and then two points with amenity=school + name=* + all the
other specific tagging. But if mapped like that, a data consumer would see
3 schools. I like your solution with overlapping multipolygons.
Janko
čet, 4. srp
My town has an Incredible Edibles scheme running. There are no planters, it is
in the ground around the square used for the weekly market, amongst other
events.
Had been interested in how tag it.
They have a greenhouse made of plastic bottles.
See Incredible Edibles Wem.
Phil (trigpoint)
The one feature page states:
More than one of something on the same site e.g. two schools sharing grounds.
Normally if the schools are separate they would have separate neighbouring
grounds, but if the only thing defining a separation between two schools is
their buildings, then the containing
Hi,
I stumbled upon some planters that are privately operated, on public
domain, contain nothing but vegetables, and are meant for anyone passing by
to help themselves. They are part of a project called "Incredible edibles"
or "Incroyables comestibles". Here's an example:
18 matches
Mail list logo
