Sorry, can't help with Pachinko, but just in regard to it all
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 15:04, John Willis via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> Amenity=gambling wiki page says:
>
> > A place for gambling, not being a bookmaker, lottery shop, casino, or
> adult gaming centre. Games
While Tagging Pachinko parlors in Japan, I came across a wiki documentation
conflict.
2 different tags say that they are the proper ones to use when tagging pachinko
parlors:
Amenity=gambling wiki page says:
> A place for gambling, not being a bookmaker, lottery shop, casino, or adult
>
On 16/10/19 19:08, David Marchal wrote:
Mateusz,
The first thing is that this tagging scheme is mainly used in Poland,
so that sounded like a local, not widely approved, tagging scheme.
The second thing, which is the real problem to me, is that I don't see
how to link these with the forest,
On 15/10/2019 16:24, Vɑdɪm wrote:
Apparently you've misunderstood the proposal. It is not about a place where
sunbathing is generally allowed, which indeed would be too vague/general.
It's about a dedicated place.
That you've changed your tune & given vague/unrealistic examples
suggests
sent from a phone
> On 16. Oct 2019, at 10:08, David Marchal wrote:
>
> The second thing, which is the real problem to me, is that I don't see how to
> link these with the forest, as a parcel number is valid only in a given
> forest. With a relation? What kind?
no need for a relation, the
16 Oct 2019, 10:08 by pene...@live.fr:
> Mateusz,
>
> The first thing is that this tagging scheme is mainly used in Poland, so that
> sounded like a local, not widely approved, tagging scheme.
>
Well, every tagging scheme starts from that.
> The second thing, which is the real problem to me, is
Mateusz,
The first thing is that this tagging scheme is mainly used in Poland, so that
sounded like a local, not widely approved, tagging scheme.
The second thing, which is the real problem to me, is that I don't see how to
link these with the forest, as a parcel number is valid only in a
