Not unclear at all.
The only thing that both the foot-cycle crossing and the foot-cycle
sidepath are tagged as single ways (highway=path, bicycle=designated,
foot=designated, segregated=yes).
And there are hundreds of these around the city.
So "my" tagging ignores the relative positions of foot
On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 at 19:22, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> This is, at least in some cases, more complicated.
> Take a road that has a parallel segregated foot-cycle path and the crossing
> itself is a segregated foot-cycle path, as in these two examples:
>
On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 at 21:30, Clifford Snow wrote:
>
> I would favor adding the name exactly as it appears in a sign, even including
> punctuation marks if it's in their sign. [...]
>
> Newspapers have a different reason for changing case and even dropping
> punctuation marks, readability. OSM
This is, at least in some cases, more complicated.
Take a road that has a parallel segregated foot-cycle path and the crossing
itself is a segregated foot-cycle path, as in these two examples:
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/S6U2AoBM5Q3jI3b-hKP5_A
Hi Mateusz!
On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 at 12:32, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> Let's say that we have footway mapped separately from the road, road has
> footways on both sides.
>
> Footway has surface=paving_stones, road has surface=asphalt.
>
> There is a crossing, made from three ways:
> - (1)
Il dom 15 dic 2019, 16:03 Greg Troxel ha scritto:
> Martin Koppenhoefer writes:
>
> > sent from a phone
> >
> >> On 14. Dec 2019, at 08:02, Francesco Ansanelli
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks everybody for the feedback.
> >> I've added the bicycle=dismount on the railway.
> >
> > if I saw this I
Martin Koppenhoefer writes:
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 14. Dec 2019, at 08:02, Francesco Ansanelli wrote:
>>
>> Thanks everybody for the feedback.
>> I've added the bicycle=dismount on the railway.
>
> if I saw this I would think I’d have to push the bike there, not take a train
It seems
On 15/12/19 12:30, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
Let's say that we have footway mapped separately from the road, road has
footways on both sides.
Footway has surface=paving_stones, road has surface=asphalt.
There is a crossing, made from three ways:
- (1) highway=footway surface=paving_stones (for
Hi Mateusz,
On 15/12/19 12:30, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
Let's say that we have footway mapped separately from the road, road
has footways on both sides.
Footway has surface=paving_stones, road has surface=asphalt.
There is a crossing, made from three ways:
- (1) highway=footway
Let's say that we have footway mapped separately from the road, road has
footways on both sides.
Footway has surface=paving_stones, road has surface=asphalt.
There is a crossing, made from three ways:
- (1) highway=footway surface=paving_stones (for a bit from centerline of
sidewalk to the
10 matches
Mail list logo
