Rewritten to
"in many cases this can be successfully guessed from the way itself
(for highway=trunk to highway=residential in many regions "paved" is a safe
bet)"
Thanks for noticing and mentioning it here (but just editing would be OK).
Feb 11, 2020, 16:51 by vosc...@gmail.com:
> Do we have
OK, you confirm that the "paved is implied" statement in the wiki page is
to be read as "assuming we are in Germany ... paved is implied" and is not
referring to some wiki page that I have not yet detected (that was my
question).
I have no problem with the statement that most residential roads in G
On Tuesday, 11 February 2020, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> Do we have any agreed implied surface values for the different street
> categories ? per country?
>
> I noticed this phrase
> "in many cases this is implied by the way itself (for highway=trunk to
> highway=residential, paved is implied) "
>
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 11 feb 2020, alle ore 16:54, Volker Schmidt ha
> scritto:
>
> I thought there was no such agreement.
> (I hope to be wrong)
there isn’t such agreement, if there isn’t any data you have to guess. In some
areas you can suppose that 99,9% of all residential roads
Do we have any agreed implied surface values for the different street
categories ? per country?
I noticed this phrase
"in many cases this is implied by the way itself (for highway=trunk to
highway=residential, paved is implied) "
on the page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_routes/cyclabi
That’s why we render surface quality tags (surface/tracktype/smoothness) in
CyclOSM on every road.
So the reader can know the real state without bad assumptions*, and choose
if he prefer whoosh or plod depending of his ride style.
https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=15/49.1637/2.6323/cyclosm
*Though we
