Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - in-kind_donation

2020-02-15 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 15 feb 2020, alle ore 18:46, Hauke Stieler > ha scritto: > > 2.) > According to [0] the convention for separation word in a key is the > underscore. So I would change the key to "in_place_donations". right, the underscore replaces spaces between words in

Re: [Tagging] Unremovable bollards

2020-02-15 Thread Volker Schmidt
I have tagged around 1k bollards without "removable" or "raising", because they looked reasonably difficult to remove, even thought most likely nearly all of them are in one way or the other removable and not really fixed. My interpretation of the the absence of these tags has been that the object

Re: [Tagging] Unremovable bollards

2020-02-15 Thread ael
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 08:15:32PM +, John Sturdy wrote: > I think that by default bollards are not removable, and that if a bollard > is not tagged as removable, it is reasonable to assume it's not removable. +1 ael ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Unremovable bollards

2020-02-15 Thread Thibault Molleman
I think that's a bad assumption to make. Could just be that nobody bothered to tag it On Sat, Feb 15, 2020, 21:17 John Sturdy wrote: > I think that by default bollards are not removable, and that if a bollard > is not tagged as removable, it is reasonable to assume it's not removable. > > On

Re: [Tagging] Unremovable bollards

2020-02-15 Thread Hauke Stieler
I don't have real data to check your statement (except the mapped bollards in OSM) but personally I don't know if that's true for all regions. I personally have the feeling that the amount is at least equal and in Hamburg, Germany I have the impression that more bollars are removable then

Re: [Tagging] Unremovable bollards

2020-02-15 Thread Jarek Piórkowski
On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 15:16, John Sturdy wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 6:54 PM Hauke Stieler wrote: >> there's the "bollard" key with documented value "rising" and "removable" >> [0] but I often encounter also bollards which cannot be removed easily. >> I would love to see the "unremovable"

Re: [Tagging] Unremovable bollards

2020-02-15 Thread John Sturdy
I think that by default bollards are not removable, and that if a bollard is not tagged as removable, it is reasonable to assume it's not removable. On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 6:54 PM Hauke Stieler wrote: > Hi all, > > there's the "bollard" key with documented value "rising" and "removable" > [0]

Re: [Tagging] Unremovable bollards

2020-02-15 Thread Thibault Molleman
Yeah, Also noticed that when mapping bollards. I'd vote on such a proposal yeah  Not sure if proposals are needed for changes this small. But I'd love to hear other people's feedback as well yeah On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 19:54, Hauke Stieler wrote: > Hi all, > > there's the "bollard" key with

[Tagging] Unremovable bollards

2020-02-15 Thread Hauke Stieler
Hi all, there's the "bollard" key with documented value "rising" and "removable" [0] but I often encounter also bollards which cannot be removed easily. I would love to see the "unremovable" value in the documentation. Should I open a proposal page for this one value? That sounds a bit of an

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - in-kind_donation

2020-02-15 Thread Hauke Stieler
Hi, I have some feedback for you: 1.) I'm not a native English spearker and personally never heard of "in-kind donations" before, so maybe a short description/definition might be needed/helpful. 2.) According to [0] the convention for separation word in a key is the underscore. So I would

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - in-kind_donation

2020-02-15 Thread Markus Peloso
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/in-kind_donation For a place that takes in-kind donations. Hi I describe a tag for shop and amenity that takes in-kind donations. I'm interested in your opinions. Best regards, Markus ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Recycling diapers

2020-02-15 Thread Francesco Ansanelli
Il sab 15 feb 2020, 15:25 ael ha scritto: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 02:52:22PM +0100, Francesco Ansanelli wrote: > > Nobody else about this key? To be honest I have another example of > > "recycling:" (not recycling) that are the batteries... So it's another > > point to the idea that recycling

Re: [Tagging] Recycling diapers

2020-02-15 Thread ael
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 02:52:22PM +0100, Francesco Ansanelli wrote: > Nobody else about this key? To be honest I have another example of > "recycling:" (not recycling) that are the batteries... So it's another > point to the idea that recycling is a namespace and diapers could be added > to the

Re: [Tagging] Recycling diapers

2020-02-15 Thread Francesco Ansanelli
Nobody else about this key? To be honest I have another example of "recycling:" (not recycling) that are the batteries... So it's another point to the idea that recycling is a namespace and diapers could be added to the list. Thanks Francesco Il mer 5 feb 2020, 13:53 Francesco Ansanelli ha