On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 19:17, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As for tagging 'dangerous areas' .. areas that pose danger such as some
> favelas cannot be tagged in OSM. I see the same logic applied to dangerous
> areas caused by wildlife.
Big difficulty in defining where to place cut-off f
>From: Jarek Piórkowski >>Do you also object when the geometry of the railway and the road is a>straight line? Do you think we should keep>https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676191068 ?>This rail company apparently went out of business 72 years ago? Mapillary images don't seem to show any trace of r
On 31/5/20 9:20 am, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
Yes, there are 1000 things in the Australian bush that'll kill you
:-), but none of them will actually eat you! (not even Drop Bears!
https://australianmuseum.net.au/learn/animals/mammals/drop-bear/ :-))
Same applies to (virtually?) all of Weste
On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 22:34, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> this is about a different topic: projects that have been started but have
> never been completed and the fragments are now either:
> repurposed
> or
> left to decay
> or
> waiting to be completed
>
> I would be quite interested in standa
On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 17:36, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > On 6. Jun 2020, at 00:04, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> > I do object strongly to the invitation to remove the
> > razed/dismantled-railway tag in the case of railway tracks have been
> > replaced by roads with the same geometry.
>
> +1
Do
sent from a phone
> On 6. Jun 2020, at 00:04, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> I do object strongly to the invitation to remove the razed/dismantled-railway
> tag in the case of railway tracks have been replaced by roads with the same
> geometry.
+1
Cheers Martin
___
sent from a phone
> On 4. Jun 2020, at 16:56, Cornelis via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> Maybe this one even serves as example for an old railway that in fact
> should be mapped to explain these clearly visible features that
> otherwise would lack an explanation?
this is about a different topic: pro
On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 13:56, Jan Michel wrote:
> Voting has ended after 14 days. There were 28 votes, 27 'yes' and one
> 'abstain'.
> This means, the two keywords 'electric_bicycle' and 'speed_pedelec' have
> been approved for use and two new vehicle categories have been
> introduced. Let's see h
Dear all,
for refining and more detailing how telephone-covers get tagged, I created a proposal that
adds four more values to the key "covered" for detailed mapping of public telephone's covers. I believe that the key covered=* is sufficient for that, added examples and tried to clea
Voting has ended after 14 days. There were 28 votes, 27 'yes' and one
'abstain'.
This means, the two keywords 'electric_bicycle' and 'speed_pedelec' have
been approved for use and two new vehicle categories have been
introduced. Let's see how this works out in our daily mapping tasks.
There we
sent from a phone
> On 5. Jun 2020, at 10:14, European Water Project
> wrote:
>
> They also expressed interest in having more Mapillary images linked to OSM
> objects.
from the OpenStreetMap point of view it seems preferable to have the images we
link to available openly. If mapillary doe
11 matches
Mail list logo
