[Tagging] R: Are we mapping ground on OSM?

> there is natural=bare_rock for some cases, generally I would go with > landcover tags. Knowing the composition of the material would be interesting > to understand what to expect when it is wet. natural=bare_rock is about bedrock, n

Re: [Tagging] Are we mapping ground on OSM?

> Generally mapping bare ground beyond the specific established tags mentioned earlier is often hard without local knowledge. Imagery taken during dry season will often read like bare ground while there is often fairly extensive plant growth (like natural=grassland) that dries up and looks indisti

Re: [Tagging] Is it bicycle_parking=stands?

I've been mapping those as a `bicycle_parking=bollard` since it has one point of contact with the floor. The one tag I find super-confusing from the wiki is `bicycle_parking=wall_loops` since it's rarely attached to the wall. Should be named `wheel_loops` really. On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 6:54 AM Mat

Re: [Tagging] Is it bicycle_parking=stands?

On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 at 06:52, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > In use it is a bicycle parking stand, you > can attach a bicycle by frame, > frame is supported. > > But it is not in a traditional reversed U > shape, but rather in O shape > > https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ABicycle_

Re: [Tagging] Is it bicycle_parking=stands?

Hi, bollard ? Le dim. 5 juil. 2020 à 12:54, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> a écrit : > In use it is a bicycle parking stand, you > can attach a bicycle by frame, > frame is supported. > > But it is not in a traditional reversed U > shape, but rather in O shape > > > h

Re: [Tagging] Is it bicycle_parking=stands?

Hi, the wiki [0] said for the tag "bicycle_parking=stands": "Use this tag for non-rectangular stands as well (e.g. round ones, fancy artistic ones, long ones allowing to attach more than two vehicles). " Sounds to me like your O-shaped frame is a stand. I also already mapped frames similar to th

[Tagging] Is it bicycle_parking=stands?

In use it is a bicycle parking stand, you can attach a bicycle by frame, frame is supported. But it is not in a traditional reversed U shape, but rather in O shape https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ABicycle_parking_-_stand_in_ring_form.jpg ___

Re: [Tagging] Are we mapping ground on OSM?

Generally speaking you touch a field where established tagging in OSM has gaps. A few notes on that: We have established and usually quite consistently used tags for a number of fairly specific natural or semi-natural non-vegetated surfaces - natural=bare_rock, natural=scree, natural=shingle,

Re: [Tagging] Are we mapping ground on OSM?

sent from a phone > On 5. Jul 2020, at 11:27, Michael Montani wrote: > > What are you thoughts? Have you ever needed or thought about how to address > this issue? Which tags would you use / propose (if needed) to map ground? there is natural=bare_rock for some cases, generally I would go wi

[Tagging] Are we mapping ground on OSM?

Dear all, when mapping landcover and landuse in OSM, it may be possible sometimes to find areas in which ground is compacted without any vegetation like in these pictures [1], [2]