Thanks!
Once again, would =lifeboat_station cover them?
Thanks
Graeme
On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 16:38, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> Fixed link on it.
>
> By looking at https://mopr.com.pl/stacje-i-ratownicy/ there are two that
> are definitely
> serious
Fixed link on it.
By looking at https://mopr.com.pl/stacje-i-ratownicy/ there are two that are
definitely
serious inland ones, maybe four of them among operated by MOPR.
And yes, there are only few of them - but still, ideally they would be covered
by nonconfusing tagging (none of
Thanks!
Would =lifeboat_station work for them, together with =fire_station?
Thanks
Graeme
On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 13:33, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portland_Fire_%26_Rescue
>
> My local Fire & Rescue department has 3 "stations" with rescue or fire
> boats on the
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portland_Fire_%26_Rescue
My local Fire & Rescue department has 3 "stations" with rescue or fire
boats on the river. For example "Station #21" is on the river, it has a
fire boat and a rescue boat. The boats are in a boathouse on a pier, while
the fire truck is in a
Thanks, but are they usually found inland?
I found a few rescue / lifeboat stations along the Polish coast, but only
one mapped inland, which either doesn't exist anymore, or it's website has
changed?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254564700
Nov 9, 2022, 00:19 by graemefi...@gmail.com:
> Looking at some of the "inland" examples shown on OT, I wonder if they should
> actually be tagged as a "lifeboat-station" at all, or whether they would be
> better shown as a lifeguard base?
>
MOPR and MOPR Giżycko station specifically for
Looking at some of the "inland" examples shown on OT, I wonder if they
should actually be tagged as a "lifeboat-station" at all, or whether they
would be better shown as a lifeguard base?
Examples, with some websites included:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299123258 +
On 8/11/22 09:00, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
On 07.11.2022 10:57, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
Favoring emergency=marine_rescue seems sensible to me
What about such stations on freshwater lakes and on rivers? Is "marine" fitting
there?
Not really. emergency=lifeboat_station
I agree; whilst we often need to explain, or refine, a definition in the Wiki,
we should NOT radically change the definitions of words. "Marine" means
"relating to or found in the sea" (Oxford Dictionaries), so we should not
re-define it to mean "relating to any watery object".
The Wiki should
sent from a phone
> On 7 Nov 2022, at 12:21, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> deprecating site_type has chance of being a good idea
I don’t think so, it is defacto one of the tags used to further specify
historic=archaeological_site and moving away from it is on the same level
old style:
https://www.scattidigusto.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Yaluz-chiosco-mercato-Garbatella-Roma.jpg
even older but different structure (single building):
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-J5az9ofXSIQ/UVgQRJwwenI/wu8/vFdrpK5JwC0/s1600/roma-farmers-market-testaccio.jpg
new style
radical
sent from a phone
> On 8 Nov 2022, at 08:15, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> I mapped some of similar shop=greengrocer (assigned space on tables) with
> shop=greengrocer street_vendor=yes
>
> Outside their operating hours you will just see empty tables with roofs over
> them
sent from a phone
> On 8 Nov 2022, at 08:17, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> Having tag name that clearly excludes freshwater water rescue and changing it
> in description is highly confusing and I would prefer to avoid it if at all
> possible.
exactly, it does not work and
13 matches
Mail list logo
