On 19.12.2022 21:21, Asa Hundert wrote
I can conceive of a case, where even without a sign changing the
software would be wrong: A motorway tunnel. They have sidewalks, to
escape in case of accidents. And guess what, foot=no applies to the
sidewalk!
How can they be sidewalks if they are not
Am So., 18. Dez. 2022 um 21:32 Uhr schrieb Brian M. Sperlongano
:
>
> I recently came across an unexpected tagging combination and I would like to
> understand how folks in various places would interpret this:
>
> highway=
> foot=no
> sidewalk=separate
>
> In my software's logic, I've made the
For routing, foot=use_sidepath and foot=no have almost the same
implications. foot=use_sidepath can be treated as foot=no (complete
prohibition) or sometimes as foot=discouraged (with a very high
penalty instead of a complete prohibition). But foot=no is used in a
variety of situations (and was
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 2:15 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> foot=use_sidepath was invented to mark "yes, on carriageway you cannot
> walk, but you can walk on separately mapped sidewalk"
>
This makes sense to me, but the wiki[1] is somewhat confusing about
Thanks for the review!
I replaced unisex=yes with unisex=only and unisex=separate, except for
hairdressers, where unisex=yes is not a problem.
Regards,
Illia.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Hello,
Le 18.12.22 à 20:19, Patrick Strasser-Mikhail a écrit :
It was pointed out[3] that 'incline' is a tag and intended to indicate a
*direction* and amount of inclination of *the road in relation to the
mapping direction*, not the direction of the *vehicle driving* on the road.
that's not
