Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Replace `*:signed` suffix key with `signed:*` prefix key

2023-02-16 Thread Marc_marc
Le 17.02.23 à 01:38, Matija Nalis a écrit : Cross-posting from the forum: thanks... we see the community split : no reply from the other to the previous message due to the fragmentation of several unconnected interface ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] dry swamps

2023-02-16 Thread Matija Nalis
On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 21:07:22 +1100, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > The ‘dry swamp’ has no apparent way to tag it. These will not be found > in Europe, just as you don’t find deserts there. > > They have occasional water, not seasonal, not yearly but, say, between 5 > to 20 years they

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Replace `*:signed` suffix key with `signed:*` prefix key

2023-02-16 Thread Matija Nalis
Cross-posting from the forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-feature-proposal-replace-signed-suffix-key-with-is-signed-prefix-key/8459/45 Voting on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Replace_*:signed_with_is_signed:* has now started. -- Opinions above are

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - landcover proposal V2

2023-02-16 Thread Cartographer10 via Tagging
In your examples you are mixing functional and physical tags. At first, we actually deprecate landuse=grass so that is -1 tag for grass. "Even if you succeed in replacing over 5 million uses of landuse=grass with landcover=grass there will still be areas of landuse=meadow and natural=grassland

Re: [Tagging] dry swamps

2023-02-16 Thread stevea
On Feb 16, 2023, at 10:50 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: > Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> writes: >> In which case the OSM meaning of 'wetland' must change to incorporate dry as >> well as wet. > > We need to adopt the professional definitions, not rewrite them roughly > and not really correctly. Not

Re: [Tagging] dry swamps

2023-02-16 Thread Greg Troxel
Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> writes: > In which case the OSM meaning of 'wetland' must change to incorporate dry as > well as wet. We need to adopt the professional definitions, not rewrite them roughly and not really correctly. Not sure which you are in favor of. >> Or if there are >>

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - landcover proposal V2

2023-02-16 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Feb 13, 2023, 20:14 by fl.infosrese...@gmail.com: > Hi, > > Le lun. 13 févr. 2023 à 14:11, Andy Townsend <> ajt1...@gmail.com> > a écrit : > >> >> > By the way, I saw some changes leading to x10 contribution rates and >> > be criticized as disrupting longstanding practices or

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - landcover proposal V2

2023-02-16 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Feb 16, 2023, 10:18 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > > landuse=meadow should delete the vegetation in the description leaving > the use ... "Used to tag an area of land used for hay (meadow) or for > grazing animals (pasture)." That would make it clear and possibly reduce > its

Re: [Tagging] dry swamps

2023-02-16 Thread Warin
On 16/2/23 04:54, Greg Troxel wrote: Andrew Davidson writes: On 15/2/23 02:00, Greg Troxel wrote: For wetlands, the definitions in the US: https://www.fws.gov/media/classification-wetlands-and-deepwater-habitats-united-states Which is: In general terms, wetlands are lands where

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - landcover proposal V2

2023-02-16 Thread Warin
On 16/2/23 14:56, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: Problem: there are 3+ tags for areas of mostly grass with sometimes overlapping meaning, in 2 different keys (landuse=meadow, natural=grassland, landuse=grass) You have forgotten at least one - landuse=farmland, crop=grass. However while