Actually thinking about this in the context of the scenario at
https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/2757#issuecomment-1435081431
I think we need a tagging solution to indicate that bicycle/foot may bypass
the gate rather than having to travel through the gate. Because while in
this
>
>
>1. As far as non-emergency routing, the "locked" tag should be ignored.
>
> As Andy points out you may have legal access but the gate is still locked
preventing physical access. Therefore routers shouldn't just ignore the
fact that the gate is locked, they should either avoid the route or
Here is my summary of the discussion so far:
This tagging combination example was shown by several people to be
appropriate for the "state on the ground" of certain barrier structures.
Therefore the question of the appropriate interpretation is a valid
question.
My interpretation was generally
Hi @Mateusz,
Thank you for clarifying the meaning of "=permit". I will have to think again
how to tag these ways. If I have used Taginfo correctly there are "only" 1503
ways with "description=redway", which I might have tagged like this!
Regards,Peter(PeterPan99)
On Wednesday, 22 February
Feb 21, 2023, 22:05 by tagging@openstreetmap.org:
> They can also be removed by maintenance workers operating with permission
> from the local Council (I have tagged the access rights of the ways with
> "motor_vehicle=permit"
>
=permit is for cases where permit is routinely granted to all
