Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Intentionally omitted name tags

Le 30.07.23 à 20:47, Nick Santos a écrit : If your question was about a "global data user" and not a "global database", I think my point still applies - having the database make the decision database don't make decision. database store the local decision :) datause may follow this decision

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Intentionally omitted name tags

> what name should a global datause for an object without name=* ? I take the proposal to mean that the database itself doesn't *need* to choose a name. Name choices are for renderers, which can be opinionated, but that the database itself can be neutral if we simply include the names in multiple

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Intentionally omitted name tags

Le 30.07.23 à 18:52, Brian M. Sperlongano a écrit : On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 12:08 PM Marc_marc > wrote: did we need to have this thread again and again ? What do you believe should go into the name tag of the bodies of water known in French as océan Atlantique

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Intentionally omitted name tags

On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 12:08 PM Marc_marc wrote: > did we need to have this thread again and again ? > [...] Regards, > Marc > What do you believe should go into the name tag of the bodies of water known in French as océan Atlantique or the body of water known as Itämeri in Finnish?

Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Intentionally omitted name tags

Le 16.07.23 à 02:38, Brian M. Sperlongano a écrit : Comment is requested on a proposal to introduce two tags to indicate the reason why a name=* tag has been omitted from a feature: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Omitted_name_tag did we need to have this thread again and again