sent from a phone
> On 25 Apr 2024, at 09:51, Christoph Hormann wrote:
>
> By established conventions of functional road tagging in OSM these would
> almost all be service roads (no through-traffic to other destinations than
> the ones the route ends at).
this is also the case with some
Hi all,
In the steel industry, a process which has started gaining adoption in
recent years is the production of steel from Direct Reduced Iron (DRI),
rather than from pig iron produced from iron ore in a blast furnace.
To give context, the two existing widespread methods of steel production
Very well. What is a minimum requirement for a sparsely populated island
with unpaved streets and roads to get its first highway=tertiary? A pair of
hamlets? A single large town? How large?
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024, 14:46 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging, <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Apr
Apr 25, 2024, 16:16 by fernando.treb...@gmail.com:
> I also think that such changes also imply corrections to the following
> section regarding how importance is to be assessed by mappers:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Assumptions
>
> Particularly this sentence:
>
> "In a
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 11:13, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> Even more clear in that regard is the use of secondary tags like
> snowmobile=yes, ice_road=yes, surface=ice. These are evidently factually
> wrong.
This is probably best discussed in changeset comments, but I'm curious
why they would
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 10:13 AM Christoph Hormann wrote:
> [...] you can try to record semantically meaningful information about the
> geographic reality.
>
> [...] Even more clear in that regard is the use of secondary tags like
> snowmobile=yes, ice_road=yes, surface=ice.
I don't think
I also think that such changes also imply corrections to the following
section regarding how importance is to be assessed by mappers:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Assumptions
Particularly this sentence:
"In a region with poor infrastructure, a road of highest importance,
> Fernando Trebien hat am 25.04.2024 geschrieben:
>
> Are such parameters absolute, or would we get a better
> map if we adapt them to local realities?
That is exactly one of the points i was trying to make. You can try to create
a better map from map styles that are not only not optimized
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 10:40, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
wrote:
> Apr 25, 2024, 14:20 by fernando.treb...@gmail.com:
>
> Considering that requiring local surveys in Antarctica would lead to
> an empty map and that assuming that governments are always lying would
> prevent us from importing
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 10:40, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
wrote:
> BTW, I think that at this point
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Antarctica/Tagging#Roads_and_routes
> section should be removed.
I think it would be better to adjust it to the emerging consensus, but
the discussion
Apr 25, 2024, 14:20 by fernando.treb...@gmail.com:
> Considering that requiring local surveys in Antarctica would lead to
> an empty map and that assuming that governments are always lying would
> prevent us from importing government data
>
please reread message you are responding to
"without
Considering that requiring local surveys in Antarctica would lead to
an empty map and that assuming that governments are always lying would
prevent us from importing government data, to me it seems relatively
safe to assume that something exists if it has visible traces in
imagery and multiple
I wanted to add some cautionary advice here.
Mapping in the Antarctic in OSM is to a much larger part than on other
continents fueled by 'imagined' things. I am not talking about stuff here
individually made up by mappers but more institutionally conjured ideas,
projections and to some extent
13 matches
Mail list logo
