I do not understand your petition if all tertiary/secondary values on
non-traverse roads of Antarctica were put by yourself. In any case due the
isolation of majority of research stations, they do not affect each other.
Regards.
De: Fernando Trebien
Enviado:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 9:01 PM Fernando Trebien
wrote:
> "a road of highest importance, forming the main road network there,
> should be highway=trunk" [1]
> "highway=trunk: The most important roads in a country's system that
> aren't motorways." [2]
>
> The comments here suggest that for a
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 21:56, Fernando Trebien
wrote:
> The comments here suggest that for a rural settlement to be a trunk
The comments here suggest that for a rural *highway* to be a trunk
--
Fernando Trebien
___
Tagging mailing list
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 14:46, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
wrote:
> If very big island has no roads at all except single small road between
> two houses it does not mean it is highway=trunk road.
I agree, but note that the wiki in principle allows this distorted
interpretation twice:
"a road
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 at 20:09, Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
wrote:
> There are also several places like Tristan da Cunha with only
> highway=unclassified/residential.
> Reading associated definitions the unclassified value seems to be the best
> fit for King George Island.
Perhaps a key difference
I agree. Reading the mailing list discussion, there have been neutral and
opposing opinions about going up from unclassified, at least on the
changeset in question. I don´t understand how tertiary is the middle ground
now.
Plus, other mappers that have commented in the changeset stating the same.
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 20:39, Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
wrote:
> there is opposition to using tertiary in Argentine bases Marambio and
> Esperanza/Fortín Sargento Cabral. Although Antarctica is an international
> space
Those would be back to unclassified/residential as they belong to the
case
I do not understand how is estimated a median point between unclassified and
tertiary values. Chilean community has shown opposition to upgrade from
unclassified to tertiary the access to Villa Las Estrellas/Frei base. The
Argentine community has not spoken in this mailing list, but those I
sent from a phone
> On 27 Apr 2024, at 10:55, Daniel Evans wrote:
>
> works:industry= is an option which is much clearer about exactly what the tag
> means. Does that sound good to you?
it is fine, maybe also just “industry”? There are a few hundred of them but not
so much with works:
apart from the usefulness in routing (as there aren’t alternatives it doesn’t
matter for routing if a road on antarctica is unclassified or primary, and
usual time estimates would generally not be useful in this particular context
and also likely more depend on the vehicle than the “road”),
(Apologies for double-posting)
Another suggestion on the Wiki is to just use works= directly instead of
works:type. It's actually already used in that way in about 1000 cases. Not
sure how I missed that!
Cheers,
Daniel
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 09:50, Daniel Evans
wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> Thanks
Hi Marc,
Thanks for the feedback - now you've mentioned it, I can definitely see the
problem.
works:industry= is an option which is much clearer about exactly what the
tag means. Does that sound good to you?
Cheers,
Daniel
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 00:12, Marc_marc via Tagging <
12 matches
Mail list logo
