and viewpoints
On Friday 17 June 2016, Amacri wrote:
> Many trekkers and bikers consider that the current Mapnik style
> provides an unsightly rendering of mountain areas and I am with them.
> Among the many aspects that would need improvement, there is a need
> that notable
Many trekkers and bikers consider that the current Mapnik style provides an
unsightly rendering of mountain areas and I am with them. Among the many
aspects that would need improvement, there is a need that notable places
which are effective references in a mountainous area could not only be shown
> On a general note - when things are mapped as nodes this is frequently
> done with the implicit notion that this is a location with a certain
> tolerance margin. You might think of mapping something with a linear way
> as a method to specify an anisotropic tolerance, well localized in one
>
Hi,
Tag place=isolated_dwelling, which should be used to name an almost
unpopulated place (often in the mountains), can be currently defined as node
(point) or polygon (area), but not as a way (line). Same consideration for
place=hamlet or place=locality: using way is not allowed for them.
