Since payment:bitcoin=yes is a de facto and used tag and since
payment:website:bitcoin=yes is not, I would suggest a combined usage of
payment:bitcoin=yes and payment:website:bitcoin=yes until the new tag is
chosen by more mappers for their use cases. I'm considering using the
combination for t
Janko Mihelić wrote:
If you are going to tag online payment methods (and I'm not 100% sure
that's ok for this database) then I would use payment:online:bitcoin=yes
instead of payment:bitcoin=yes. Payment:xxx=* is a tag reserved for offline
payment methods, so you can look at it as though it alrea
Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
Exactly, we are not tagging websites.
Some websites are connected to the ground which we map. They are
physical stores on ground, you can go in there if you visit Sweden at
some point. The payment is done on the website. To get your product you
have to be in the store
Richard Welty wrote:
why not payment:point_of_sale:bitcoin=yes/no
payment:offline doesn't seem quite right to me.
Ok. My idea is that payment:bitcoin=yes and
payment:point_of_sale:bitcoin=yes/no should be used together if it is
correct information for a place.
My reasoning is that payment:bi
In Sweden we got an electronics chain called Webhallen who accept
Bitcoin as payment through their website and allows the customer to pick
up the goods they purchase at any of the business's store locations. It
does to my knowledge not accept purchase of goods with Bitcoin through
their cash re
