People's Park in Berkeley was known for, among other things, its "free box".
https://www.peoplespark.org/wp/free-clothing-box/
Might be a less encumbered term than "givebox" given the trademark issue
Paul raises.
Eric
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 3:38 PM Jmapb via Tagging
wrote:
> On 1/6/2020 5:41
Created a table of recommended values manually and ditched the idea of
multiple pages created using ValueDescription.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 5:54 PM Eric Theise wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm writing up the documentation for mimics. It was clear from comments
> that people desire
Hi everyone,
I'm writing up the documentation for mimics. It was clear from comments
that people desired a stronger statement of the recommended values for the
key.
I was under the impression that by using a KeyDescription template at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mimics and
Voting was open from 29 Nov 2019 through 13 Dec 2019. The final tally was
21 yes votes, 0 no votes, and 3 abstentions.
Thanks to everyone who voted and/or participated in the discussion.
Eric
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Hi everyone,
The two week discussion period about this feature has elapsed and I am
calling for a vote at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Mimics
You may remember that the proposed feature applies to cellphone masts and
towers that are disguised, to varying degrees of
imics" is well-understood and
precise so I'm going to leave that in the proposal.
Thanks, Eric
P.S. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camouflage
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 4:06 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 at 08:40, Eric Theise wrote:
>
>>
>> The
I've updated the proposal to incorporate Paul Allen's suggestion that the
practice of using tower:construction=concealed be deprecated when a mast or
tower is tagged with mimics=*.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:39 PM Eric Theise wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for the quick feedback.
>
&
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the quick feedback.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:20 PM Paul Allen wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 20:54, Eric Theise wrote:
>
>>
>> I propose to introduce the key mimics to remedy this.
>>
>
> I'm not sure "mimics" is a good key, but
I've emailed the list with a Request For Comments on a key for
communication masts and towers: mimics.
Thanks, Eric
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 1:57 PM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> On 14. Nov 2019, at 22:04, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don not understand
Since 1992 cellphone masts and towers have been disguised as trees, cacti,
and other features of the natural and built world. The suggested practice
for tagging this infrastructure is to use man_made=tower or man_made=mast
with tower:type=communication in combination with
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 1:17 PM ael wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 01:00:29PM -0800, Eric Theise wrote:
> > tower:type=communication
> > tower:construction=concealed
> >
> > and either man_made=mast or man_made=tower should cough up cellphone
> towers
&g
Hi everyone,
>From my morning reading it seems that entities tagged with
tower:type=communication
tower:construction=concealed
and either man_made=mast or man_made=tower should cough up cellphone towers
masquerading as cacti, palms, pines, flagpoles, and such. But apart from a
note="pine
12 matches
Mail list logo
