I consider using highway=path on urban shared cycle/footways a very bad an confusing practice. A path is an unpaved, one man width little way in a forest or a green area. This is not a by default paved cycleway nor a footway. I prefer using cycleway for these shared ways, because that is the highest in hierarchy. Path is the lowest, and when looking on a map, seeing a path, I don't think that it could be a well lit and paved cycleway. Many primary roads can be accessed via bicycle and foot too, but still we don't map it as a path, with motor_vehicle=designated, etc. I think these paths are polluting urban maps and misinforming map users.
Regards, Márton Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2019. júl. 7., V 0:10): > > > > 7 lip 2019, 00:07 od matkoni...@tutanota.com: > > 6 lip 2019, 23:52 od dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > > sent from a phone > > On 6. Jul 2019, at 23:41, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> > wrote: > > It sounds like bicycle=yes, at least that is > how such objects are tagged in Poland. > > > > at least in Germany there is a difference between bicycle=yes on a footway > (it means they must not ride faster than walking speed and give way to > pedestrians) and bicycle=designated which means it is a dedicated shared > way and pedestrians and cyclists are on the same level. > > Or in order words, with yes it is still a footway with an exception for > bicycles, while with dedicated it becomes a mixed-use way. > > It is the same in Poland, though on > bicycle=designated, foot=designated, > segregated=no pedestrians have priority > over pedestrians > > pedestrians have priority over cyclists, sorry > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging