Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] nomoj de internaciaj objektoj / nazwy obiektów międzynarodowych / names of international objects

2020-01-06 Thread Maarten Deen
On 2020-01-07 08:27, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: 6 Jan 2020, 16:35 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: sent from a phone On 6. Jan 2020, at 07:29, Maarten Deen wrote: Baltic Sea to be the "Baltic Sea" or for South America to be "South America" - this is an example of

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] nomoj de internaciaj objektoj / nazwy obiektów międzynarodowych / names of international objects

2020-01-05 Thread Maarten Deen
On 2020-01-05 23:25, Tomek wrote: EN (automatic translation) I plan to remove the "name" and "wikipedia" tags from places that are not associated with a specific nation or language: * continents * north and south poles * seas and bays, but exceptionally leaving the "name" tag for seas with a

Re: [Tagging] waterway=fairway?

2016-07-20 Thread Maarten Deen
I think the general concencus is that waterway=fairway is a useful tag. I'll just add it to the wiki so people will know about it. I'm also going to change the waterway=lake to waterway=fairway where I come across it and think it should be changed. Regards, Maarten

[Tagging] waterway=fairway?

2016-07-17 Thread Maarten Deen
I'm seeing some ways tagged with waterway=fairway in the Netherlands. Some examples: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215071961 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210382535 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215071958 These examples have all been added in

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] If a school is a shelter when a disaster happens...

2015-12-30 Thread Maarten Deen
On 2015-12-30 16:33, Dongpo Deng wrote: Hi all, There is a problem for tagging shelters. In Taiwan, some of schools are selected to be shelters for villages or small regions when a disaster happens. However, it is conflict to annotate two amenities on a geometry object. That is, we cannot

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] OSM is a right mess

2015-06-03 Thread Maarten Deen
On 2015-06-03 12:08, Shaun McDonald wrote: On 3 Jun 2015, at 07:00, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote: I agree that in every case where oneway=yes is not implied, oneway=no is superfluous (in a network design way), but that does not make oneway=no superfluous. There are some cases where

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] OSM is a right mess

2015-06-03 Thread Maarten Deen
On 2015-06-03 02:04, pmailkeey . wrote: iD shows oneway=unknown if it's not set. If it's unknown, iD should not show oneway at all. I agree. In OSM if oneway=no then it's not oneway and the oneway tag should not appear at all. Here I don't agree. The only time oneway should appear is in

[Tagging] foot=yes or bicycle=yes on track without other limitations?

2013-07-10 Thread Maarten Deen
Is there a deeper meaning of adding foot=yes or bicycle=yes to highway=track or highway=path without adding other limitations? I thought track and path are by default routable for foot and bicycle, so IMHO they add nothing. Examples: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/53561813