Re: [Tagging] reviving hollow way

I am actually a bit surprised by this. It may be a research related term, but "hollow way" seems quite common in British English archaeology... See these links: - Historic England: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1016748 - Shorne Woods Arhaeology Group:

Re: [Tagging] "building=college" tag missing from building key page

b-categories They are already used in OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ISCED So the original enquiry can be addressed with building=school and isced:level=* On 2017-12-08 22:30, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 7. Dec 2017, at 19:31, M

Re: [Tagging] "building=college" tag missing from building key page

specific terminology is vast. Op 7-12-2017 om 17:05 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer: 2017-12-07 14:40 GMT+01:00 Marco Boeringa <ma...@boeringa.demon.nl <mailto:ma...@boeringa.demon.nl>>: * school: tag mostly used for kindergarten or primary school: generally only classrooms and

Re: [Tagging] "building=college" tag missing from building key page

is the architectural perspective? tom On 07.12.2017 13:13, Marco Boeringa wrote: "building=college" is missing from the main building key page (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building). This tag is the equivalent of building=school/university as the accompanying key for tagging the actual

[Tagging] "building=college" tag missing from building key page

Hi, I noticed the tag "building=college" is missing from the main building key page (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building). This tag is the equivalent of building=school/university as the accompanying key for tagging the actual buildings of an "amenity=college". It seems

Re: [Tagging] building=stands or building=grandstand?

I don't think arguments as "is the more generic term" are all that convincing in the context of OSM. There are quite a number of cases in OSM where a well established tag with proper documentation may not always have the most "appropriate" name for its key or value. I think the current changes

Re: [Tagging] building=stands or building=grandstand?

Warin, Tom did not totally remove the reference to "building=stands", it is listed as discouraged on the new "building=grandstand" Wiki page. As to "building=grandstand", although undocumented, I have seen this used on exactly the type of structure Tom included. Of course, the difference as

[Tagging] building=stands or building=grandstand?

Hi all, I noticed on the building key Wiki page, that it seems there is a new entry for "building=stands" for the tribunes of a sports stadium. Now I can't recall having seen this tag before, but I do know that there is an old (minimum 4 years) and quite widely used similar tag

Re: [Tagging] Simplify building:part areas

With building:part you are actually describing 3D volumes. These volumes don't necessarily start at ground level, but ideally should not intersect in 3D. As you can see in the Simple 3D building specification, you can set a "building:min_level" and "min_height" to "raise" a certain part from