Hi,
Pieren wrote:
Why not simply dress=no ? ^^
Some people might argue for dress=dismount.
SCNR,
Stefan
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hello,
SomeoneElse wrote:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I have no doubt that these situations occur, I was only pointing out that
bicycle is not the right key to state anything about pushing a bike as
this has nothing to do with cycling.
What about the equivalent situation for horses?
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
IMHO we should encourage tagging of the permission of pedestrians to push a
bicycle only for those few places where it isn't allowed to do so (and
probably
in many of these cases it won't just be forbidden to push a bicycle or two,
but
also to carry it/them,
Hi,
fly wrote:
Hey
I wonder if it is useful to tag bicycle=dismount on ways.
At least in Germany there is no official traffic sign despite of the
existence of some.
Every time I see such a sign, I get very angry about the fucking moron,
who was responsible for this bullshit. Of course,
Hi,
John F. Eldredge wrote:
If you really meant it is in no way acceptable to require people to dismount
their bikes,
Indeed this is what I meant. Thanks for pointing out this ambiguity!
what about the real-life situation I described earlier, a narrow
footway along one side of a bridge,
