On 2 avr. 2013, at 18:54, Satoshi IIDA nyamp...@gmail.com wrote:
Why don't use our old relation = tarffic_lights? (or junction?)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Traffic_Lights
(yes, it need more advanced!)
Yes, this is also my favorite solution to the problem. It only
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Vladimir Vyskocil
vladimir.vysko...@gmail.com wrote:
Relation feature essentially means, group up some objects to represent as
a feature.
So I think it could suite for our traffic_signal junction naming,
routing.
(relation could express label membership)
Le mar. 09 avril 2013 à 10:56 +0200, Pieren a écrit :
Note that we have intersections with names and intersections with traffic
signals. It does not have to be on the same relation types because it is
imho two different features.
+1; with the increasing complexity in traffic signals to come
I think we need some clean-up in the traffic signals tags/relations anyway.
+1 for single traffic signals tags and for a relations to manage them. Who
wants to make a proposal?
Viking81
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Why don't use our old relation = tarffic_lights? (or junction?)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Traffic_Lights
(yes, it need more advanced!)
I would like to against write them as area.
Relation feature essentially means, group up some objects to represent as
a feature.
So I
I think it's time to switch to the tagging list !
The tagging scheme that seems preferred in this discussion is the following :
- simple named junctions : use junction=yes and name=*
- complex named junctions with several lanes crossing a different points :
two propositions :
Vladimir Vyskocil vladimir.vysko...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it's time to switch to the tagging list !
The tagging scheme that seems preferred in this discussion is the
following :
- simple named junctions : use junction=yes and name=*
- complex named junctions with several lanes
Hi!
There is a proposal to group together parts of a junction:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway%3Djunction
A relation is total overkill for such a simple task.
regards,
Martin
2013/3/28 Vladimir Vyskocil vladimir.vysko...@gmail.com:
I think it's time to switch to
2013/3/28 Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com
Hi!
There is a proposal to group together parts of a junction:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway%3Djunction
A relation is total overkill for such a simple task.
I saw this proposal before and I liked it. Now I like
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
I saw this proposal before and I liked it. Now I like it even more because
it solves the junction name problem.
As area, only used 3 times by 2 different users in one year (date of
the proposal):
2 by the proposal writer
10 matches
Mail list logo
