2015-03-12 7:54 GMT+01:00 Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com:
reference to
the definition found in Wikipedia and that's also how I've used the
tag.
and if someone changes the Wikipedia page, the definition for our tag
will change as well?
How likely is that? Not that
On 11 March 2015 at 23:52, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 11.03.2015 um 19:43 schrieb Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com:
reference to
the definition found in Wikipedia and that's also how I've used the
tag.
and if someone changes the Wikipedia page, the
Am 11.03.2015 um 14:59 schrieb Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
I object to admin_level=10 since
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:admin_level%3D10#11_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries
most often uses that for place=neighbourhood but apart from that it looks
very
On 11/03/2015 17:29, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 11.03.2015 um 14:59 schrieb Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
I'd only use admin_level if this is really an administrative entity. place and
admin are orthogonal.
Yes, thanks for reminding that - let's keep admin_level out of the way
of
Hi Jean-Marc,
Thank you for your detailed input and review on this idea.
It indeed looks to fit well within the existing scheme as a more refined
urban territorial subdivision.
place = city/town suburb neighbourhood city_block/block / plot
The trouble is there is no definition yet of
On 11/03/2015 18:04, althio wrote:
To Séverin,
For your particular case with your students and considering your time
frame I would say:
IMO it is taggable, no need to avoid in OSM. Go ahead.
My preference is either place=block or place=plot. Pick as you wish
and set the trend.
Why not
W dniu 11.03.2015 18:04, althio napisał(a):
It indeed looks to fit well within the existing scheme as a more
refined urban territorial subdivision.
place = city/town suburb neighbourhood city_block/block / plot
Yet another two, to be complete:
... borough suburb quarter
On 11 March 2015 at 18:14, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
On 11/03/2015 18:04, althio wrote:
To Séverin,
For your particular case with your students and considering your time
frame I would say:
IMO it is taggable, no need to avoid in OSM. Go ahead.
My preference is either
On 11 March 2015 at 18:04, althio althio.fo...@gmail.com wrote:
The trouble is there is no definition yet of city_block
Not so. When I added it to osm wiki I also put there a reference to
the definition found in Wikipedia and that's also how I've used the
tag.
/Markus
I do not have the answer but I wanted to look towards place=* tagged as area.
A few possibilities may include:
place=block [taginfo ~1 200 as area] [no wiki]
place=city_block [taginfo ~900 as area] [wiki documentation, mostly in
Stockholm, Sweden]
place=plot [taginfo ~900 as area] [no wiki]
Am 11.03.2015 um 19:43 schrieb Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com:
reference to
the definition found in Wikipedia and that's also how I've used the
tag.
and if someone changes the Wikipedia page, the definition for our tag will
change as well?
cheers
Martin
On 11/03/2015 13:25, althio wrote:
I do not have the answer but I wanted to look towards place=* tagged as area.
I like that approach - it will let us position this entity within the
existing frame of concentric urban territorial subdivisions.
place=block [taginfo ~1 200 as area] [no wiki]
12 matches
Mail list logo
