Am 20/mar/2014 um 06:39 schrieb bulwersator bulwersa...@zoho.com:
Is it reasonable to expect that well tagged road contains all access
tags necessary to check whatever it is accessible?
In other words - is it OK to tag area like proving ground with
access=no, without tagging roads on
Practically I don't think it will work, as it requires much more data to
be processed in the preprocessing - I therefore agree with Martin.
But I think an intermediate solution should and could work:
If all entrances to the area are not accessible (e.g. gates, lift-gates
and such), adding
On 3/20/14 6:33 AM, Peter Wendorff wrote:
Personally I would consider routers to be buggy when they ignore
barriers tagged on nodes of the way, while I would accept them not to do
geometrical calculations between areas and ways.
absolutely they are buggy. here is one example from my own
bulwersator wrote:
In my opinion all relevant access tags should be on way and its nodes,
otherwise it is unclear whatever road inherits access data from area.
Yes, and it shouldn't be a goal to inherit access tags from surrounding areas.
Even if mappers would consistently set layer=* on the way
Is it reasonable to expect that well tagged road contains all access
tags necessary to check whatever it is accessible?
In other words - is it OK to tag area like proving ground with
access=no, without tagging roads on this area with proper access tags?
Should cases like this be reported by
