On 10/07/2020 19.45, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
On 7/10/20 09:04, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
(I would probably use access=permissive for e.g. a mall parking lot,
where it's not strictly public, but where you wouldn't be expected to be
visiting a particular building or organization such that it's much
sent from a phone
> On 11. Jul 2020, at 15:43, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> If ever we map
> everything in the world as a first approximation, then we can worry about
> second approximations.
actually you do not have to map everything in the world in a first
approximation in order to map details,
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 08:35, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> I believe the distinction should be whether a place has any area where
> visitors/customers are welcome or not. Almost any place will have some
> areas with restricted access, and it does not seem helpful to make
> distinctions based
sent from a phone
> On 11. Jul 2020, at 00:42, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> You then get the problem that customers are allowed to come in to the front
> counter / service / reception area, but the rest of the office / building is
> strictly staff only
I believe the distinction should be
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 18:35, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>> (I would probably use access=permissive for e.g. a mall parking lot,
>> where it's not strictly public, but where you wouldn't be expected to be
>> visiting a particular building or organization such that it's much less
>> clear whether
On 7/10/20 09:04, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> (I would probably use access=permissive for e.g. a mall parking lot,
> where it's not strictly public, but where you wouldn't be expected to be
> visiting a particular building or organization such that it's much less
> clear whether or not you are a
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 00:53, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> I was thinking about space that explicitly welcomes walk-ins and exists
> solely to
> handle them (office of an energy company - handling issues such as
> resolving
> billing mistakes, handling
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 00:05, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
>
> I think this makes sense also. To a previous point, I take
> access=customers to mean someone intending to visit the associated
> location, whether that's a store, a church, a doctor's office, ...
>
> BTW, I've used access=customers for
Jul 10, 2020, 15:57 by mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com:
> On 09/07/2020 17.34, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
>
>> Jul 9, 2020, 20:38 by pla16...@gmail.com:
>>
>>> Maybe not ideal, but if you're looking for an immediate solution then
>>> access=customers and access=private?
>>>
>> I like it,
(Apologies if this double-posts; my mail client is telling me it
couldn't be sent, but I've known it to lie about that...)
On 09/07/2020 18.57, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
Jul 9, 2020, 23:58 by pla16...@gmail.com:
I take "customers" to mean "non-employees who may access the
facility
On 09/07/2020 17.34, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
Jul 9, 2020, 20:38 by pla16...@gmail.com:
Maybe not ideal, but if you're looking for an immediate solution then
access=customers and access=private?
I like it, but it is a bit tricky as I can walk into many offices without being
a
Jul 9, 2020, 23:58 by pla16...@gmail.com:
>
>
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 22:36, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <>
> tagging@openstreetmap.org> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jul 9, 2020, 20:38 by >> pla16...@gmail.com>> :
>>
>>>
>>> Maybe not ideal, but if you're looking for an immediate solution then
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 22:36, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Jul 9, 2020, 20:38 by pla16...@gmail.com:
>
>
> Maybe not ideal, but if you're looking for an immediate solution then
> access=customers and access=private?
>
> I like it, but it is a bit tricky
Jul 9, 2020, 21:21 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 9. Jul 2020, at 19:27, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
>> wrote:
>>
>> Both appear to be tagged as office=company, but it seems to me that
>> there is a clear need to distinguish between
>>
>> (a) company office
Jul 9, 2020, 20:38 by pla16...@gmail.com:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 18:27, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <>
> tagging@openstreetmap.org> > wrote:
>
>> Both appear to be tagged as office=company, but it seems to me that
>> there is a clear need to distinguish between
>>
>> (a) company office
sent from a phone
> On 9. Jul 2020, at 19:27, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> Both appear to be tagged as office=company, but it seems to me that
> there is a clear need to distinguish between
>
> (a) company office where I can walk in
> and buy service (or handle issues with
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 18:27, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> Both appear to be tagged as office=company, but it seems to me that
> there is a clear need to distinguish between
>
> (a) company office where I can walk in
> and buy service (or handle issues with
Both appear to be tagged as office=company, but it seems to me that
there is a clear need to distinguish between
(a) company office where I can walk in
and buy service (or handle issues with an existing one)
(b) company office closed to outsiders, where workers are not
interacting with
18 matches
Mail list logo
