Hi Roland,
I made a fresh attempt to explain things as simple as it gets:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Polyglot/Public_transport_proposal_for_simplification
I might expand this to how I see we could extend this tram and metro
mapping. For trains I would add such nodes for each sub
Hi,
What I would like to see is how to map a Public Transport Route in
version 3 .. that has the bear minimum of things to have and the rules
that make the route valid.
This is where the problem sits; the point of view of what a route is
vary wildly. Few people are even willing to pinpoint
On 25/07/2018 05:58, Roland Olbricht wrote:
Hi,
This would not be the bells and whistles method, but the bread and
water method. The basics that would have the routing working and the
map displaying things.
See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop
I see fundamental
Hi,
This would not be the bells and whistles method, but the bread and water
method. The basics that would have the routing working and the map
displaying things.
See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dplatform
Hi,
As part of the proposal .. I think a document on how to map PTv3 in the
simplest most basic way needs to be done.
This would not be the bells and whistles method, but the bread and water
method. The basics that would have the routing working and the map displaying
things.
It needs to
Hi Ilya,
I unfortunately won't be anywhere near Milan anytime soon, but thanks
for the invitation :)
The problem I can see with your proposal is that it appears to be based
on PTv1, not on PTv2, which looks much more logical to me (even though I
still don't understand it completely). I mean,
On 07/24/2018 11:17 PM, Jo wrote:
> The whole point of wanting to move to a simpler tagging scheme is to become
> able to write simple to understand documentation.
From what I understood (so, second-hand information) PTv2 can be used
with as few objects and tags as PTv1, so it's not inherently
Hi Leo,
As a person who tried for many years not to touch any public transport in OSM
because of hard to understand tagging, I share your pain about missing
tutorials and instructions. The situation with these is a bit better in the
Russian part of wiki, because we don't have hordes of mappers
The whole point of wanting to move to a simpler tagging scheme is to become
able to write simple to understand documentation.
Dropping the "v1" tags that some like to call 'deprecated' is not possible,
because then your stops don't render.
Replacing highway=bus_stop by public_transport=platform
My point of view, as a beginner in OSM who still hasn't understood how
PTv1 and PTv2 are supposed to work (and thus didn't read this specific
proposal, take this as generic comments on PT tagging in OSM):
1. Beginners are already at a loss, introducing a third (!) tagging
scheme will just make
10 matches
Mail list logo
