Re: [Tagging] Double, double, toil and trouble (how to map Witch's Cauldron?)

2018-10-07 Thread Paul Allen
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 11:56 PM Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > A collapsed cave on land is a sinkhole. Is that not appropriate? > The wiki for natural=sinkhole seems to imply it is for any type of sinkhole, however formed. But the wiki for sinkhole=* doesn't have anything that precisely matches

Re: [Tagging] Double, double, toil and trouble (how to map Witch's Cauldron?)

2018-10-07 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
A collapsed cave on land is a sinkhole. Is that not appropriate? The natural=cliff idea is also sensible and correct for the edge of the hole Natural=arch on a node is a great idea for the natural bridge between the collapsed section and the open sea. There are plenty of similar features on

Re: [Tagging] Double, double, toil and trouble (how to map Witch's Cauldron?)

2018-10-07 Thread Paul Allen
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 9:52 PM ael wrote: > > No. I am sure that I have seen a dedicated/specialist term for exactly > these features. Just can't recall the details ATM. As I mentioned in another part of this thread, I subsequently found that the correct term for one of these is a littoral

Re: [Tagging] Double, double, toil and trouble (how to map Witch's Cauldron?)

2018-10-07 Thread ael
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 08:32:56PM +0100, Paul Allen wrote: > On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 8:10 PM ael wrote: > > There are tags for caves in general and could be applied to a sea cave. > But the only way the > cave tags can be applied to a collapsed sea cave is to pretend the collapse > is a sink

Re: [Tagging] Double, double, toil and trouble (how to map Witch's Cauldron?)

2018-10-07 Thread Paul Allen
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 8:10 PM ael wrote: > Is that the stream tagged with source = npe? Yep. Just because you can't see it from your armchair, doesn't mean that it > isn't there. Although I admit npe is often a bit approximate, and it may have dried up. > NPE is very approximate. And

Re: [Tagging] Double, double, toil and trouble (how to map Witch's Cauldron?)

2018-10-07 Thread ael
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 06:11:38PM +0100, Paul Allen wrote: > I've encountered a feature called, in English, "Witch's Cauldron" (also > "Witches Cauldron" and "Witch's Pit") and > called, in Welsh, "Pwll y Wrach." It was mapped by somebody else around 4 > years ago and the mapping has > one

Re: [Tagging] Double, double, toil and trouble (how to map Witch's Cauldron?)

2018-10-07 Thread Paul Allen
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 6:26 PM Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > I would tag it as a waterway in tunnel (though I have no idea about a > suitable value) > For me, a tunnel is man-made, not natural. The tunnel=* I see in the wiki seem (at quick glance) to all be man-made. or as water area with

Re: [Tagging] Double, double, toil and trouble (how to map Witch's Cauldron?)

2018-10-07 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
I would tag it as a waterway in tunnel (though I have no idea about a suitable value) oras water area with covered=yes and natural=bare_rock area mapped, both with a proper tags. It also sounds like it is a tourism=attraction . Sounds a bit similar to

[Tagging] Double, double, toil and trouble (how to map Witch's Cauldron?)

2018-10-07 Thread Paul Allen
I've encountered a feature called, in English, "Witch's Cauldron" (also "Witches Cauldron" and "Witch's Pit") and called, in Welsh, "Pwll y Wrach." It was mapped by somebody else around 4 years ago and the mapping has one definite error and a couple of things that may be wrong. The problem is