Hello.
In the discussion about the proposal about type=traffic_signals_group
it was suggested to use the term “set” instead of “group”. So I’ve
adapted the wiki page of the proposal and I’ve moved it to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/traffic_signals_set
--
Lukas Sommer
Okay. I’ve made some clarifications to the proposal (avoid confusion
with coordination of traffic signals along a length of road …).
The remaining problem is the tag value “type=traffic_signals_group”. I
agree that “group” is not the best choise. We could maybe switch to
Hello.
This is a request for comments for the proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/traffic_signals_group
The original author is Sanderd17. With the consent of him, I did some
supplementing. Thanks to Sanerd17!
Unlike the proposal “Proposed features/Traffic Signals” of
Hi,
This could be confused with the coordination of traffic signals along a
length of road or even a district wide coordination of traffic light
signals.
I think it needs some words that restrict it to a single intersection?
And possibly some thought to where a length of road (many
If group is not a good word, then set is a good alternative.
Javbw
On Feb 26, 2015, at 8:33 AM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This could be confused with the coordination of traffic signals along a
length of road or even a district wide coordination of traffic light signals.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:55 PM, John Willis jo...@mac.com wrote:
If group is not a good word, then set is a good alternative.
intersection_group=
intersection_set=
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Looks like this has already been discussed .. in 2008 to 2011.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Set_of_Traffic_Signals
No outcome for that ..
Past discussion looks to have pointed to a relation ... the relation
contains each node of traffic_light and can have a name=
The practical use is that routing algorithms can calculate the travel time more
accurate if the durations are known. By specifying the via ways a routing
algorithm knows which signals can be ignored. Simulations can be done more
precisely.
To reply to the other comments:
I am aware of the
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Tom Pfeifer t.pfei...@computer.org wrote:
Sorry but I'm sceptical about the scheme. It adds very little value
compared
to its own complexity. In particular the timing of the lights is highly
volatile
in modern cities, and it seems impossible to collect the
Sorry but I'm sceptical about the scheme. It adds very little value compared
to its own complexity. In particular the timing of the lights is highly volatile
in modern cities, and it seems impossible to collect the ground truth as a
mapper just by observing them.
Take the 2050 traffic lights in
Additional to below I want to mention that on a micromapping style a
traffic_signal is placed one the pedistrian crossing or the stop_line. I
even came across ones one the stop_line and an addition highway=crossing
on the pedestrian crossing.
I am tagging direction=* for the direcion it faces.
Hi,
Am 2015-01-18 um 19:02 schrieb fly:
Additional to below I want to mention that on a micromapping style a
traffic_signal is placed one the pedistrian crossing or the stop_line. I
even came across ones one the stop_line and an addition highway=crossing
on the pedestrian crossing.
I am
Hello Everybody,
please take some time to read my proposal concerning more detailed modelling of
traffic signals and tell me your thoughts.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Traffic_Signals
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Traffic_Signals
I will keep
13 matches
Mail list logo
