what about natural=boulder for a remarkable rock?
There are only a disappointing 18 occurrences, but maybe with some promotion...
I would also be fine with natural=rock like it is suggested by you.
Completely agree that natural=rock for rock covered areas doesn't fit
well in the tagging scheme
On 10.07.2013 14:04, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
what about natural=boulder for a remarkable rock?
A boulder is a loose single rock fragment. That's what the tag natural=stone
is for.
I would also be fine with natural=rock like it is suggested by you.
Great. :-)
Completely agree that
2013/7/10 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at
I am not sure about this, because there's also natural=water, natural=sand
etc.
there is not much etc., and natural=sand is of course also disputed ;-)
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
It's actually not a feature proposal, but a clarification and cleanup proposal.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/natural%3Drock_cleanup
--
Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/
Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria
