Okay. I’ve made some clarifications to the proposal (avoid confusion
with coordination of traffic signals along a length of road …).
The remaining problem is the tag value “type=traffic_signals_group”. I
agree that “group” is not the best choise. We could maybe switch to
Hello.
This is a request for comments for the proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/traffic_signals_group
The original author is Sanderd17. With the consent of him, I did some
supplementing. Thanks to Sanerd17!
Unlike the proposal “Proposed features/Traffic Signals” of
Hi,
This could be confused with the coordination of traffic signals along a
length of road or even a district wide coordination of traffic light
signals.
I think it needs some words that restrict it to a single intersection?
And possibly some thought to where a length of road (many
If group is not a good word, then set is a good alternative.
Javbw
On Feb 26, 2015, at 8:33 AM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This could be confused with the coordination of traffic signals along a
length of road or even a district wide coordination of traffic light signals.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:55 PM, John Willis jo...@mac.com wrote:
If group is not a good word, then set is a good alternative.
intersection_group=
intersection_set=
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Looks like this has already been discussed .. in 2008 to 2011.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Set_of_Traffic_Signals
No outcome for that ..
Past discussion looks to have pointed to a relation ... the relation
contains each node of traffic_light and can have a name=
