Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Coastline-River transit placement

2014-03-30 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Sunday 30 March 2014, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: The Rio de la Plata example on the wiki page is pretty weird. Well -the Rio de la Plata example is definitely the largest, but not the weirdest since the coastline there is placed at the outer limit of the estuary. In case of the Northern

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Coastline-River transit placement

2014-03-29 Thread Christoph Hormann
Hello, i put up a proposal for specifying somewhat tighter limits on where to place the transit between the coastline and the riverbank polygon at the mouth of a river: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Features/Coastline-River_transit_placement Currently there are essentially no

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Coastline-River transit placement

2014-03-29 Thread Richard Z.
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 03:44:17PM +0100, Christoph Hormann wrote: Hello, i put up a proposal for specifying somewhat tighter limits on where to place the transit between the coastline and the riverbank polygon at the mouth of a river:

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Coastline-River transit placement

2014-03-29 Thread Malcolm Herring
On 29/03/2014 20:29, Richard Z. wrote: Currently there are essentially no rules at all on this matter Nor will there ever be. OSM mappers are free spirits! ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Coastline-River transit placement

2014-03-29 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Saturday 29 March 2014, Richard Z. wrote: [...] * if part of the rationale is to determine whether some city is on the coast than that would typically be better defined by harbor or other properties. Any such application will require a more fine-grained approach anyway. Is there a harbor?