Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards (mine shaft)

2020-11-27 Thread Brian M. Sperlongano
It seems to me that there is a clear case for there being both hazardous and non-hazardous examples of man_made=mineshaft. The question is how to tag the ones that are hazardous. I think the right answer is simply man_made=mineshaft + hazard=yes. If we were to approve hazard=open_mineshaft, you

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards (mine shaft)

2020-11-27 Thread ael via Tagging
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 04:01:09PM -0500, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 3:41 PM ael via Tagging > wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 09:11:25AM -0500, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote: > > > I am not opposed to including unsigned hazards > > > > There are a surprising number o

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards (mine shaft)

2020-11-26 Thread Paul Allen
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 21:56, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote: I'm not sure if all mine shafts are hazardous or only some of them, but in > any case, > If the mineshaft is capped in some way, such as a grill, and the cap cannot be removed without special tools, it's probably safe. If the mineshaft h

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards (mine shaft)

2020-11-26 Thread Brian M. Sperlongano
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 3:41 PM ael via Tagging wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 09:11:25AM -0500, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote: > > I am not opposed to including unsigned hazards > > There are a surprising number of abandoned open mineshafts in the far > West of England which are a hazard, if not